Vieron el incidente y pensaron que era una desgracia.

Questions & Answers about Vieron el incidente y pensaron que era una desgracia.

Why does this sentence use the word desgracia instead of a word for 'tragedy'?
Desgracia is actually a false friend! While it looks like the English word 'disgrace', it translates to 'tragedy', 'misfortune', or 'disaster'. If you wanted to talk about a 'disgrace' (something shameful), you would use a word like vergüenza or deshonra.
Why is pensaron in the preterite tense here instead of the imperfect (pensaban)?
Using the preterite pensaron shows that the thought occurred to them as a specific, sudden reaction to the incident. They saw it and immediately formed the thought. If the sentence used pensaban, it would imply a continuous, background state of mind ('they were thinking' or 'they used to think').
Why is era in the indicative? Doesn't expressing a thought or opinion trigger the subjunctive?
In Spanish, affirmative verbs of thinking or believing (like pensaron que or creo que) take the indicative because the subject is declaring what they believe to be a fact. You generally only use the subjunctive when these verbs are negative, such as no pensaron que fuera una desgracia.
Why do we switch from the preterite (vieron, pensaron) to the imperfect (era)?
The preterite verbs vieron and pensaron act as the main events moving the narrative forward: first they saw it, then they thought about it. The imperfect era is used because it describes the characteristics of the event in the background. It tells us what the incident 'was like' rather than a new action taking place.

Learn Vieron el incidente y pensaron que era una desgracia and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free