El hermoso vitral fue roto por ese niño.

Questions & Answers about El hermoso vitral fue roto por ese niño.

Why do we use fue instead of estuvo for "was" in this sentence?
This sentence uses the analytical passive voice to describe a specific action, which requires the verb ser. Fue roto means the window received the action of being broken. If you used estuvo roto, you would be describing the resulting physical state of the window being in pieces, which does not pair with an active agent like por ese niño.
Why didn't we use the passive with se (se rompió) for this sentence?
The analytical passive is the right choice here because the sentence explicitly names the agent who performed the action using por ese niño. The passive with se is typically used when the person doing the action is unknown, unimportant, or intentionally left out.
Does the past participle roto have to agree with the subject?
Yes! In the analytical passive voice, the past participle must agree in both gender and number with the subject receiving the action. Because el vitral is masculine and singular, we use roto. If the subject were feminine and plural, like las ventanas, it would change to fueron rotas.
Why is hermoso placed before vitral instead of after?
Placing descriptive adjectives before the noun is a stylistic choice. It emphasizes the subjective, inherent beauty of the stained glass window, making the sentence sound a bit more poetic or emotional than if we used el vitral hermoso merely to distinguish it from an ugly window.

Learn El hermoso vitral fue roto por ese niño and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free