Me acuerdo de que la luna de miel fue un desastre, a pesar de que previmos todo.

Questions & Answers about Me acuerdo de que la luna de miel fue un desastre, a pesar de que previmos todo.

Why is previmos in the indicative here instead of the subjunctive?
Because a pesar de que (even though) introduces a known, established fact in this sentence. The speakers actually did anticipate everything, so the indicative is required. If the sentence were hypothetical (like "Even if we had anticipated everything..."), you would use the subjunctive.
Why is there a de before que in Me acuerdo de que?
The pronominal verb acordarse requires the preposition de (literally, to remember about something). When it's followed by a que clause, you must keep the de. Dropping it is a common mistake (called "queísmo"), but keeping it is grammatically correct. If you used the synonym recordar, you would drop the preposition: Recuerdo que...
Is previmos an irregular verb form? It looks a lot like ver.
Yes, prever (to foresee / anticipate) is made up of the prefix pre- plus the verb ver (to see). It is conjugated exactly like ver. Just as "we saw" is vimos, "we anticipated" is previmos. Learners often mistakenly add an extra vowel (like preveímos), but simply applying the ver conjugation is the trick!
Why do we use fue (from ser) to say it was a disaster? Isn't being a disaster a temporary state?
When you are evaluating an event as a whole (like a party, a concert, or la luna de miel), you use ser. You aren't describing a temporary physical or emotional state of a person or thing; you are summarizing how the event itself unfolded and what it amounted to.

Learn Me acuerdo de que la luna de miel fue un desastre, a pesar de que previmos todo and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free