Question 1

Why use the imperfect (era) and then the passato prossimo (abbiamo visto) in the same sentence?

Accepted Answer

This is a classic refresher on how past tenses interact. era molto trascurato sets the scene by describing the ongoing physical state of the apartment. lo abbiamo visto is the specific, completed action (the moment of seeing it) that occurred against that background state.

Question 2

Does the past participle visto agree with the pronoun lo here?

Accepted Answer

Yes. When you use a third-person direct object pronoun (lo, la, li, or le) before a compound tense formed with avere, the past participle must agree with the pronoun in gender and number. Since lo refers to the masculine singular l'appartamento, visto takes the masculine singular -o ending.

Question 3

Is era molto trascurato considered the passive voice here?

Accepted Answer

It acts more like a copula (linking verb) plus an adjective describing a state. Trascurato is the past participle of trascurare (to neglect), but paired with the imperfect era, it describes the resulting condition the apartment was in, rather than the ongoing action of someone actively neglecting it at that moment.

Question 4

How could we express a similar idea using the implicit conditional (a + infinitive) from this lesson?

Accepted Answer

You could rephrase this as A vederlo, l'appartamento era molto trascurato (Upon seeing it / If you saw it, the apartment was very neglected). The structure a vederlo acts as an implicit clause that elegantly replaces the explicit time clause quando lo abbiamo visto.

L'appartamento era molto trascurato quando lo abbiamo visto.

Breakdown of L'appartamento era molto trascurato quando lo abbiamo visto.

Questions & Answers about L'appartamento era molto trascurato quando lo abbiamo visto.

Learn L'appartamento era molto trascurato quando lo abbiamo visto and more in Italian