L'ultimo decreto ha imposto che i sudditi rimanessero sottomessi.

Questions & Answers about L'ultimo decreto ha imposto che i sudditi rimanessero sottomessi.

Why is rimanessero in the imperfect subjunctive?
The main verb ha imposto expresses a command and is in a past tense. When reporting a past command where the subject changes—from the decree (l'ultimo decreto) to the subjects (i sudditi)—Italian requires che followed by the imperfect subjunctive (rimanessero) to show the actions happened in the same timeframe.
Since this is an indirect command, could I use di + infinitive instead?
In this specific sentence structure, no. To use di + infinitive, the group receiving the command usually needs to be the indirect object of the main verb (e.g., ha imposto ai sudditi di rimanere sottomessi). Because i sudditi is instead the subject of the second clause, you must use che + subjunctive.
Why is sottomessi plural?
Sottomessi is the past participle of sottomettere (to submit/subdue). Here it functions as an adjective describing the state of the subjects (i sudditi). Since i sudditi is masculine plural, sottomessi must agree in gender and number.
Does l'ultimo decreto mean the "final" decree or the "latest" decree?
It can mean either! Context determines the exact translation. Placed before the noun, ultimo means either the absolute last one in a sequence (final) or the most recent one (latest). In news or historical contexts, "the latest decree" is a very common meaning.

Learn L'ultimo decreto ha imposto che i sudditi rimanessero sottomessi and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free