Breakdown of Non trovano il carico, sarà andato distrutto quando la nave è affondata.
essere
to be
non
not
quando
when
trovare
to find
Questions & Answers about Non trovano il carico, sarà andato distrutto quando la nave è affondata.
Why use andato here instead of stato to say the cargo was destroyed?
This sentence uses the passive of loss and destruction. In Italian, verbs describing loss, damage, or misplacement (like distruggere, perdere, or sprecare) often use andare instead of essere to form the passive. This puts extra focus on the negative outcome or the finality of the loss, translating naturally as 'gotten destroyed'.
Why is a future tense (sarà andato) used to talk about something that happened when the ship sank in the past?
This is a great example of using the future perfect tense (futuro anteriore) to express a deduction or strong guess about the past. While English relies on the modal verb 'must' (it must have gotten destroyed), Italian uses the future perfect to show that this is a very likely hypothesis about a past event.
What do the two participles andato and distrutto agree with in this sentence?
They both agree with the subject of that clause, il carico (the cargo), which is a masculine singular noun. Because this passive construction uses andare to form its compound tense, both the auxiliary's participle (andato) and the main verb's participle (distrutto) must agree in gender and number with the subject.
Why does affondare (to sink) take essere in è affondata instead of avere?