Per trovare la sua indipendenza, lo lascio viaggiare da solo.

Questions & Answers about Per trovare la sua indipendenza, lo lascio viaggiare da solo.

Why do we use the direct object pronoun lo instead of gli (to him) for "I let him"?
In the permissive construction (lasciare + infinitive), the person who is allowed to do the action is the direct object of lasciare. Since "him" is the direct object, we use lo rather than the indirect object pronoun gli.
Could I attach the pronoun lo to the infinitive, like lascio viaggiarlo?
No, you can't attach it to the second verb here. In constructions with lasciare (to let) or fare (to make) plus an infinitive, the pronoun belongs to the main conjugated verb. It must go before it: lo lascio viaggiare.
Why does the sentence start with Per trovare instead of just Trovare to mean "To find"?
When an English sentence uses "to" plus a verb to mean "in order to" or to show the purpose of an action, Italian requires per followed by the infinitive.
Why use da solo instead of just saying solo?
While both translate to "alone," da solo specifically means doing an action "by oneself" or "on one's own" without help. solo is more about the physical or emotional state of being alone. Since this sentence is about finding independence, da solo is the perfect fit.
Why does it say la sua indipendenza? Doesn't sua already mean "his"?
Yes, but Italian almost always requires a definite article (here, la) before a possessive adjective (sua). The main exception is for singular family members (like mio padre), but since indipendenza is a regular noun, it needs the article.

Learn Per trovare la sua indipendenza, lo lascio viaggiare da solo and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free