Question 1

Why is fu used here instead of è stata or era?

Accepted Answer

fu is the passato remoto (historical past) of essere. We use it here because a dynasty is a historical entity from the distant past, and its period of influence is completely finished. If you were talking about a recent political family, you might use the passato prossimo (è stata). If you were describing their ongoing state in the background of a story, you would use the imperfetto (era), but fu states their past influence as a completed historical fact.

Question 2

Why doesn't influente end in -a to match the feminine word dinastia?

Accepted Answer

influente belongs to a group of adjectives that end in -e in the singular. These adjectives use the exact same form for both masculine and feminine nouns. They only change their ending in the plural, where they become -i (for example, dinastie influenti).

Question 3

Why is it in Italia instead of nell'Italia?

Accepted Answer

In Italian, you almost always use the simple preposition in without a definite article when talking about being inside or going to a country, region, or large island. You only add the article (combining it into nella or nell') if you add an adjective or description, like nell'Italia del Sud (in Southern Italy).

Question 4

Is there a reason we use Quella instead of Questa here?

Accepted Answer

Yes! Quella means that, pointing to something far away in space or time. Since we are talking about a historical dynasty using the distant past tense (fu), it makes perfect sense to refer to it as a distant that dynasty (quella dinastia) rather than a present or close-by this dynasty (questa dinastia).

Quella dinastia fu veramente influente in Italia.

Breakdown of Quella dinastia fu veramente influente in Italia.

Questions & Answers about Quella dinastia fu veramente influente in Italia.

Learn Quella dinastia fu veramente influente in Italia and more in Italian