Breakdown of Ci hanno assicurato che avrebbero pagato il conto.
avere
to have
il conto
the bill
pagare
to pay
ci
to us
che
that (conjunction introducing a clause)
assicurare
to assure
Questions & Answers about Ci hanno assicurato che avrebbero pagato il conto.
Why do we use the past conditional (avrebbero pagato) instead of the present conditional for "would pay"?
In Italian, when you report a future action from the perspective of the past (they promised back then that they would pay later), you must use the past conditional. This rule is called the "future in the past". English uses "would + verb" here, which looks like the present conditional, making this a tricky difference to remember!
If the past conditional normally means "would have paid", why does it translate to just "would pay" here?
Does ci mean "us" or "to us" in this sentence?
It means "to us". It acts as an indirect object pronoun because the verb structure is assicurare qualcosa a qualcuno (to assure something to someone). They assured the fact that they would pay to us.
What tense would we use if the first part of the sentence was in the present tense?
If the main verb is in the present, like ci assicurano (they assure us), you use the standard future tense for the second action: che pagheranno il conto (that they will pay the bill). The past conditional is only triggered because the first verb is in the past!
Learn Ci hanno assicurato che avrebbero pagato il conto and more in Italian
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free