Escríbeme una reseña breve y añádele la bibliografía al final, que así no se te olvida.

Because the verbs are in the tú imperative:

• Escríbeme = write me
• Añádele = add to it

Those are commands to tú, which is the informal singular you used in Spain.

If it were formal usted, you would expect:

• Escríbame
• Añádale

So this sentence is clearly speaking to one person in an informal way.

In Spanish, affirmative commands usually attach object pronouns to the end of the verb.

So:

• escribe + me → escríbeme
• añade + le → añádele

This is normal with positive commands.

With negative commands, the pronouns go before the verb instead:

• No me escribas una reseña breve
• No le añadas la bibliografía

So the position of the pronoun changes depending on whether the command is affirmative or negative.

The accent marks keep the original stress of the command after the pronoun is attached.

Without pronouns:

• escribe → stress on cri
• añade → stress on ña

When you add pronouns, the words get longer:

• escríbeme
• añádele

The written accent shows that the stress stays where it was supposed to stay.

So the accent is not random; it is there to preserve pronunciation.

Here me means to me or for me.

So Escríbeme una reseña breve is literally something like:

• Write me a short review
• or Write a short review for me

It is an indirect object pronoun. The review is the thing being written, and me is the person who receives it.

English works similarly in sentences like:

• Write me an email
• Send me the file

This is a very common question.

In añádele la bibliografía:

• la bibliografía is the direct object: the thing being added
• le is the indirect object: the thing you are adding it to

The implied meaning is:

• Añade la bibliografía a la reseña

Then a la reseña becomes le:

• Añádele la bibliografía

So le refers to the review.

Why not la?

Because la would replace la bibliografía, not la reseña.

Compare:

• Añádele la bibliografía = add the bibliography to it
• Añádela al final = add it at the end

In the second one, la = the bibliography.

Both are possible, but they are not exactly the same in tone.

• una reseña breve = the most neutral, straightforward order
• una breve reseña = also correct, but slightly more literary or stylistically marked

In Spanish, descriptive adjectives often come after the noun, especially in neutral instructions.

So una reseña breve sounds very natural in this kind of sentence.

Al final is a contraction of:

• a + el → al

So:

• al final = at the end

Here final is being used as a noun, not just as an adjective.

This is the same pattern as:

• al principio = at the beginning
• al final = at the end

You cannot say a el final here; it must contract to al final.

Spanish often uses the definite article when talking about something specific and identifiable from the context.

Here, la bibliografía means the bibliography that belongs with that review. It is not just any bibliography in general; it is the specific one expected at the end of the text.

So añádele la bibliografía sounds more natural than a bare añade bibliografía in this context.

This part is very colloquial and very useful.

Breakdown:

• que = here it introduces an explanation, something like because / that way
• así = that way
• no se te olvida = you won’t forget it / it won’t slip your mind

So the whole idea is:

• ..., because that way you won’t forget it
• or ..., so you don’t forget it

This que is not the same as the that in every English sentence; here it works more like a conversational connector introducing the reason.

Because olvidarse is very commonly used in Spanish to express the idea that something slips your mind.

• No lo olvidas = you do not forget it
• No se te olvida = it does not get forgotten by you / it does not slip your mind

The second version often sounds more natural when talking about accidental forgetting.

In se te olvida:

• se is part of the pronominal construction
• te marks the person affected: to you
• the subject is the thing forgotten, understood here as la bibliografía or eso

So literally it works more like:

• the bibliography doesn’t get forgotten on you

That sounds strange in English, but it is very normal in Spanish.

Because this part is being presented as a statement/explanation, not as a purpose clause with the subjunctive.

• ..., que así no se te olvida = ..., because that way you won’t forget it

So Spanish uses the indicative: olvida.

If the speaker wanted a more explicit so that you don’t forget it structure, they could say:

• ..., para que no se te olvide

That version uses the subjunctive: olvide.

So:

• que así no se te olvida = conversational explanation
• para que no se te olvide = clearer purpose clause

Both make sense, but the original sounds very natural in everyday speech.