Breakdown of Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
Questions & Answers about Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
Tivesse is the imperfect subjunctive of ter, and it’s the standard form used in Portuguese in hypothetical / unreal "if" clauses about the past or about situations that are not real.
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência...
= If I had more patience (but I didn’t / don’t).
If you said:
- Se eu tinha mais paciência...
this would sound wrong or very odd in standard European Portuguese in this kind of hypothetical sentence. You normally need the subjunctive (here: tivesse) after se when you’re expressing an unreal or contrary‑to‑fact condition.
Teria explicado is the conditional perfect (also called past conditional).
It’s formed with:
- ter in the conditional (teria, terias, teria, teríamos, teriam)
- the past participle of the main verb (explicado)
So:
- teria explicado = would have explained
- teria feito = would have done
- teria dito = would have said
In this sentence, teria explicado refers to an unreal action in the past: explaining that did not happen (or did not happen in that calmer way).
It’s a counterfactual conditional about the past:
- Condition (unreal): Se eu tivesse mais paciência
- Result (unreal past result): teria explicado tudo com mais calma
In English this corresponds to:
- If I had had more patience, I would have explained everything more calmly.
It talks about something that did not happen (you didn’t have enough patience, and you didn’t explain things calmly).
Yes. You can say:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
- Teria explicado tudo com mais calma se eu tivesse mais paciência.
Both are correct. The meaning is the same.
When the if‑clause (se‑clause) comes first, it’s standard to put a comma after it. When it comes second, the comma is usually omitted:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
- Teria explicado tudo com mais calma se eu tivesse mais paciência.
In Portuguese, when a dependent clause (like a conditional clause with se) comes before the main clause, it’s normally separated by a comma:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
- Quando eu cheguei, ele já tinha saído.
- Se chover, não vamos sair.
If you invert the order and put the main clause first, the comma is usually not used:
- Teria explicado tudo com mais calma se eu tivesse mais paciência.
- Não vamos sair se chover.
Yes, that’s also correct, but it slightly changes the time reference and nuance.
Se eu tivesse mais paciência, explicaria tudo com mais calma.
→ More like: If I had more patience, I would explain everything more calmly (in general / now / habitually).Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
→ More like: If I had had more patience (in that specific situation), I would have explained everything more calmly.
So:
- explicaria (simple conditional) often refers to a present or general unreal situation.
- teria explicado (conditional perfect) refers to a past unreal situation.
Both can be correct, but there’s a nuance:
Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
- Focus on a general quality: If I were a more patient person / if I had more patience (as a trait), I would have explained…
Se eu tivesse tido mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
- Focus on that particular moment or episode: If I had had more patience (then, at that time), I would have explained…
So tivesse can suggest a more general lack of patience, while tivesse tido zooms in on a specific situation in the past.
Portuguese often uses nouns where English prefers adjectives:
- ter paciência = to have patience
- ter mais paciência = to have more patience / be more patient
So:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência…
~ If I had more patience / If I had been more patient…
You could technically use the adjective paciente:
- Se eu fosse mais paciente…
This is also correct and close to English: If I were more patient…
But ter (mais) paciência is extremely common and very idiomatic.
Com mais calma is a prepositional phrase used adverbially to describe how the explaining would be done:
- com = with
- mais = more
- calma = calm / calmness
Literally: with more calm(ness)
Functionally: more calmly.
So:
- teria explicado tudo com mais calma
≈ would have explained everything more calmly.
It’s very natural in Portuguese to use com + noun as an adverbial phrase:
- falar com cuidado = to speak carefully
- agir com pressa = to act in a hurry
- responder com calma = to answer calmly
Yes, mais calmamente is also grammatically correct:
- Teria explicado tudo mais calmamente.
However, in everyday European Portuguese, com mais calma sounds more natural and idiomatic than mais calmamente, which is a bit more formal or bookish.
So both are possible, but:
- com mais calma → more common in speech and informal writing
- mais calmamente → correct, but less frequent in casual conversation
No, se does not always require the subjunctive. It depends on the type of condition:
Real / likely condition (indicative)
- Se tiver tempo, ligo‑te.
If I have time, I’ll call you. - Se chove, não saio.
If it rains, I don’t go out.
- Se tiver tempo, ligo‑te.
Unreal / hypothetical condition (subjunctive)
- Se eu tivesse tempo, ligava‑te.
If I had time, I would call you. - Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
If I had had more patience, I would have explained everything more calmly.
- Se eu tivesse tempo, ligava‑te.
In your sentence, the situation is unreal / contrary to fact, so Portuguese uses the imperfect subjunctive (tivesse).
Yes. In informal European Portuguese, people often mix se + imperfect subjunctive with a compound past in the indicative instead of a conditional perfect, for example:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência, tinha explicado tudo com mais calma.
Formally, grammar books prefer:
- Se eu tivesse mais paciência, teria explicado tudo com mais calma.
But in everyday speech in Portugal, tinha explicado (or tinha explicado tudo com mais calma) is very common in this type of conditional, even though it’s not the "textbook" form.