Breakdown of sensei ga kaesita touan wo mitara, bunpou no matigai ga ikutuka atta.
Questions & Answers about sensei ga kaesita touan wo mitara, bunpou no matigai ga ikutuka atta.
Why does 返した come before 答案?
Because Japanese uses a relative clause before the noun it modifies.
So 先生が返した答案 means:
- the answer sheet that the teacher returned
In English, the noun usually comes first and the description comes after it:
- the answer sheet that the teacher returned
In Japanese, it is the other way around:
- 先生が返した
- 答案
This is a very common pattern:
- 私が昨日買った本 = the book I bought yesterday
- 友だちが作ったケーキ = the cake my friend made
Why is が used after 先生?
Here, 先生 is the subject of 返した.
- 先生が返した答案 = the answer sheet that the teacher returned
Inside that mini-clause, the teacher is the one doing the action of returning, so が marks the subject.
This が only belongs to the relative clause:
- 先生が返した
It does not mark the subject of the whole sentence.
Why is there no particle between 返した and 答案?
Why is 答案 marked with を?
Because 答案 is the direct object of 見たら.
The structure is:
- 先生が返した答案 = the answer sheet the teacher returned
- を見たら = when/after I looked at it
So the whole first part means:
- when I looked at the answer sheet that the teacher returned
Even though 答案 is modified by the clause 先生が返した, it is still the thing being looked at, so it takes を.
What does 見たら mean here? Is it if I look or when I looked?
Here it means when I looked or after I looked.
The たら form can express:
- a condition: if
- a time sequence: when/after
In this sentence, the second clause tells you something was discovered as a result of looking:
- 文法の間違いがいくつかあった = there were several grammar mistakes
So 見たら is best understood as a temporal/discovery meaning:
- when I looked
- after looking
A natural interpretation is:
- When I looked at the answer sheet the teacher returned, there were several grammar mistakes.
Why are there two が particles in the sentence?
Because they belong to different clauses.
先生が返した
- 先生 is the subject of 返した
文法の間違いがいくつかあった
- 文法の間違い is the subject of あった
So the sentence has two parts:
- 先生が返した答案を見たら
- 文法の間違いがいくつかあった
This is very normal in Japanese. Each clause can have its own subject marker.
Why is it 文法の間違い and not 文法が間違い?
What does いくつか mean, and why is it placed there?
いくつか means several or some.
In this sentence:
- 文法の間違いがいくつかあった = there were several grammar mistakes
This placement is very natural with ある and いる:
- 本が何冊かある = there are several books
- 問題がいくつかあった = there were several problems
You could also see:
- いくつかの文法の間違い which means several grammar mistakes
But with existence verbs like ある, Japanese often uses:
- noun + が + quantity + ある
Why is あった used instead of いた?
Because 間違い is inanimate.
Japanese uses:
- ある for inanimate things
- いる for animate beings, especially people and animals
So:
- 間違いがあった = there was a mistake
- 学生がいた = there was a student
Since grammar mistakes are not living things, ある / あった is the correct choice.
Who is the person that looked at the answer sheet? Why isn’t it stated?
The subject is omitted because Japanese often leaves out information that is understood from context.
So 見たら here most likely means:
- when I looked or possibly
- when we looked depending on context
Japanese does this all the time:
- 食べた = I ate / he ate / she ate / they ate
- 行きます = I will go / he will go / etc.
The listener usually figures it out from the situation. In this sentence, the natural assumption is that the speaker looked at their own returned answer sheet.
Is 答案 the same as テスト or 紙?
Not exactly.
答案 refers to an answer sheet, exam paper, or written answers, and it sounds a bit more formal or academic.
So:
- 答案 = answer sheet / exam paper
- テスト = test, quiz, exam
- 紙 = paper
In this sentence, 答案 is a good word because the teacher is returning a student’s written work, and the speaker is checking it afterward.
Could 先生は返した答案 work instead of 先生が返した答案?
Usually 先生が返した答案 is the more natural choice here.
In a relative clause, が is commonly used to mark the subject of the action:
- 先生が返した = the teacher returned
Using は inside a relative clause is possible in some contexts, but it often adds a contrastive or topical nuance and is less neutral here.
So for a straightforward description, が is the standard choice:
- 先生が返した答案 = the answer sheet that the teacher returned
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from sensei ga kaesita touan wo mitara, bunpou no matigai ga ikutuka atta to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions