Breakdown of getuyou no kawari ni mokuyou ni kaigi wo surukoto ni natta.
Questions & Answers about getuyou no kawari ni mokuyou ni kaigi wo surukoto ni natta.
Why is it 月曜のかわりに and not just 月曜かわりに?
The noun かわり usually connects to another noun with の.
So:
- 月曜のかわりに = instead of Monday
- A の かわりに B = B in place of A
Here, 月曜 is a noun, so の links it to かわり.
This is a very common pattern:
- お茶のかわりにコーヒーを飲む = drink coffee instead of tea
- 私のかわりに彼が行く = he will go instead of me
Without の, it would sound ungrammatical.
What does かわりに mean exactly in this sentence?
Here, かわりに means instead of or in place of.
So:
- 月曜のかわりに木曜に = on Thursday instead of Monday
Be aware that かわりに can have other meanings in other contexts, such as in exchange for or as compensation for, but in this sentence it clearly means a substitution of one day for another.
Why is there a に after 木曜?
The に after 木曜 marks the time when the meeting will take place.
- 木曜に = on Thursday
Days of the week often take に when you want to mark the specific time of an event:
- 月曜に行く = go on Monday
- 木曜に会議をする = have the meeting on Thursday
In casual speech, this に is sometimes omitted with time expressions, but here it is completely natural and clear.
Why are there so many に particles in this sentence?
They are doing different jobs:
月曜のかわりに
- に is part of the fixed expression かわりに
- meaning: instead of Monday
木曜に
- に marks the time: on Thursday
することになった
- に is part of the grammar pattern ことになる
- meaning: it has been decided that... / it ended up that...
So even though the same particle appears three times, each one belongs to a different structure.
Why is it 会議をする? Why not 会議がある?
Both are possible in Japanese, but they mean slightly different things.
- 会議をする = to hold/conduct a meeting
- 会議がある = there is a meeting
This sentence uses 会議をする, which focuses on the action of having or conducting the meeting.
So:
- 木曜に会議をすることになった = it was decided that we will hold the meeting on Thursday
If you said:
- 木曜に会議があることになった
that would mean something more like:
- it was decided that there will be a meeting on Thursday
Both can work, but 会議をする is very common when talking about arranging or scheduling a meeting.
What does することになった mean?
Verb dictionary form + ことになる is a very common grammar pattern.
Here:
- する = do
- すること = the act of doing / doing it
- することになる = it becomes the case that one will do it
- することになった = it has been decided that one will do it / it ended up being decided that one will do it
So the sentence means that the plan or arrangement changed, and now the meeting is to be held on Thursday.
A key nuance: ことになった often sounds like the decision came from circumstances, rules, or a group decision, not just from the speaker alone.
How is ことになった different from ことにした?
This is one of the most common learner questions.
- ことにした = I/we decided to do it
- ことになった = it was decided / it has been decided
So:
木曜に会議をすることにした
- someone actively made the decision
- often implies the speaker or decision-makers chose it
木曜に会議をすることになった
- the decision is now the situation
- often sounds more neutral, less focused on who decided
In this sentence, ことになった fits well because it sounds like a schedule change or organizational decision.
Why is こと needed? Why not just say 会議をするになった?
Because なる cannot directly attach to a plain verb like する in this pattern.
The こと turns the verb phrase into a noun-like unit.
- 会議をする = to hold a meeting
- 会議をすること = holding a meeting / the act of holding a meeting
Then that whole action can become the thing that was decided:
- 会議をすることになった = it became decided that we will hold a meeting
So こと is doing a nominalizing job here.
Why is the final verb なった in the past tense if the meeting is in the future?
Because the past tense applies to the decision, not to the meeting itself.
- 会議をする = the meeting will be held
- ことになった = it became decided / it was decided
So the sentence means:
- the decision was made already
- the meeting itself will happen later
This is very natural in Japanese.
Compare:
- 日本に行くことになった。
- It has been decided that I will go to Japan.
The going is future, but the deciding is already complete.
Why is there no subject like 私たちは or 会社は?
Japanese often omits subjects when they are understood from context.
In this sentence, the important information is:
- Monday was replaced
- Thursday is the new day
- the meeting is what was rescheduled
- it has been decided
The listener can usually infer who is involved from the situation, such as we, the company, the team, etc.
A fuller version could be something like:
- 私たちは月曜のかわりに木曜に会議をすることになった。
- 会社では月曜のかわりに木曜に会議をすることになった。
But Japanese often leaves that out if it is obvious.
Why does the sentence use 月曜 and 木曜 instead of 月曜日 and 木曜日?
Both are correct.
- 月曜 / 木曜 are slightly shorter and more conversational
- 月曜日 / 木曜日 are a bit fuller and sometimes a little more formal or careful
In everyday Japanese, the shorter forms are extremely common:
- 月曜に
- 木曜に
So this sentence sounds very natural.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from getuyou no kawari ni mokuyou ni kaigi wo surukoto ni natta to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions