Kannst du mir eine Serviette reichen? Ich habe Marmelade auf den Fingern.

Can you pass me a napkin? I have jam on my fingers.

Breakdown of Kannst du mir eine Serviette reichen? Ich habe Marmelade auf den Fingern.

• ich: I
• du: you
• haben: to have
• können: can
• auf: on
• mir: me
• reichen: to pass
• eine: a; (feminine, accusative)
• den: the; (plural, dative)
• der Finger: the finger
• die Serviette: the napkin
• die Marmelade: the jam

Questions & Answers about Kannst du mir eine Serviette reichen? Ich habe Marmelade auf den Fingern.

Why does the sentence start with Kannst?

Because it’s a yes/no question. In German, yes/no questions typically use verb-first word order:
Kannst (verb) + du (subject) + …
In a statement it would be: Du kannst mir eine Serviette reichen.

What’s the difference between Kannst du…? and Können Sie…?

Kannst du…? is informal (used with friends, family, kids).
Können Sie…? is formal/polite (used with strangers, in many service situations, professional settings).
Same meaning, different level of formality.

Why is it mir and not mich?

Because reichen commonly takes:

• a direct object (thing being passed) in the accusative
• an indirect object (person receiving it) in the dative

So:

• mir = dative = to me
• eine Serviette = accusative = a napkin

How do I know eine Serviette is accusative here?

It’s the thing being handed over (the direct object). Also, Serviette is feminine, and eine can be nominative or accusative for feminine nouns—so the form alone doesn’t prove it, but the verb pattern does:
jemandem (dat.) etwas (akk.) reichen.

Why use reichen instead of geben?

Both can work, but they feel slightly different:

• reichen = to hand/pass (often something nearby, especially at a table)
• geben = to give (more general)

So Kannst du mir eine Serviette reichen? sounds very natural for passing a napkin.

Is there a more polite way to ask this, even with du?

Yes. German often uses könntest (could you) or adds bitte:

• Könntest du mir bitte eine Serviette reichen?
• Kannst du mir bitte eine Serviette reichen?

Why is it Ich habe Marmelade auf den Fingern and not an den Fingern?

Both can be used, but the nuance differs:

• auf den Fingern = on the surface of the fingers (typical for sticky stuff like jam)
• an den Fingern = on/at the fingers (more general; can sound like it’s attached/located there)

For jam, auf den Fingern is very common.

Why does auf use den Fingern (dative) and not die Finger (accusative)?

auf is a two-way preposition:

• dative = location/state (where something is)
• accusative = movement/destination (where something is going)

Here it’s describing a state: the jam is already there → auf den Fingern (dative).
Movement example: Ich schmiere Marmelade auf die Finger. (accusative)

Why is it den Fingern and not meinen Fingern?

German often uses the definite article (den Fingern) instead of a possessive when it’s obviously your own body part—especially with things like pain, injuries, dirt, etc.
auf meinen Fingern is possible, but it can sound more emphatic or contrastive (my fingers, not yours).

Why is Fingern plural here?

Because jam usually gets on more than one finger, and German naturally uses the plural in that situation.
If it’s clearly only one finger, you can say: auf dem Finger.

What’s the pronunciation of reichen and Serviette?

• reichen: the ch is the soft sound after front vowels (like in ich), roughly RYE-khen with a soft ch.
• Serviette: stress is usually on the last syllable: ser-vee-ET-te (with German r and clear vowels).