Learn Hardcore German: In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt. - In this moment I realize that the music gives me a lot of good.

In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

In this moment I realize that the music gives me a lot of good.

Breakdown of In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

this; (masculine or neuter, dative)

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning German now

Questions & Answers about In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

Why is it In diesem Augenblick and not in dieser Augenblick or in diesen Augenblick?

The preposition in can take either accusative or dative:

Accusative = movement into something (Wohin?).
Dative = location/time in/at something (Wo? / Wann?).

Here we are talking about a point in time: in this moment / at this moment, so it’s dative.

Augenblick is masculine, singular.
The dative form of dieser (this) for masculine singular is:

Nominative: dieser Augenblick
Accusative: diesen Augenblick
Dative: diesem Augenblick
Genitive: dieses Augenblicks

So in diesem Augenblick is “in/at this moment” in the dative case.

Could I also say Ich merke in diesem Augenblick, dass ...? Is the word order important?

Yes, you can absolutely say:

Ich merke in diesem Augenblick, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

German main clauses require the finite verb (here merke) to be in 2nd position, but position 1 is flexible:

In diesem Augenblick merke ich, ...
Ich merke in diesem Augenblick, ...

Both are correct.

The difference is emphasis:

In diesem Augenblick merke ich ...
Emphasizes “right now, at this exact moment”.
Ich merke in diesem Augenblick ...
Neutral, typical subject-first sentence.

The grammar is fine in both cases; it’s just a stylistic choice.

What exactly does merke mean here? Is it “I notice”, “I realize”, or “I feel”?

The verb merken can mean several slightly different things depending on context:

merken (non‑reflexive):
- “to notice”, “to realize”, “to sense”
- Here: Ich merke, dass ... ≈ “I realize / I notice that ...”
sich etwas merken (reflexive):
- “to remember something / to memorize something”
- e.g. Ich merke mir deinen Namen. – “I’ll remember your name.”

In In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt,
merke is best translated as:

“I realize that the music is doing me a lot of good.”
“I notice how much good the music does for me.”

Both “notice” and “realize” work; “realize” sounds a bit more like a sudden insight, which fits the “in this moment” feeling well.

What is the function of dass, and why is the verb gibt at the end of the clause?

dass is a subordinating conjunction meaning “that” (in the sense of “I know that ...”, “I realize that ...”).

In German, a subordinate clause introduced by dass has:

the conjugated verb at the very end of the clause.

So:

Main clause: Ich merke – verb in 2nd position.
Subordinate clause: ..., dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt – verb at the end.

Structure of the subordinate clause:

dass (subordinator)
mir (dative pronoun)
die Musik (subject, nominative)
viel Gutes (direct object, accusative)
gibt (finite verb at the end)

This verb-final order is a standard rule for dass‑clauses in German.

Why is it mir and not mich?

mir is the dative form of “me”, while mich is the accusative form.

The verb geben (“to give”) usually takes:

a subject in the nominative (who gives?)
an indirect object in the dative (to whom?)
a direct object in the accusative (what is given?)

In this sentence:

die Musik = subject (nominative)
mir = indirect object (dative) → to me
viel Gutes = direct object (accusative) → a lot of good (things)

So the pattern is:

Die Musik (Nom.) gibt mir (Dat.) viel Gutes (Acc.).

Therefore, mir is correct because the music “gives (something) to me”.

If mir comes before die Musik in the sentence, does that mean mir is the subject?

No. In German, word order does not always show the grammatical role as clearly as in English. Case endings are more important.

In dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt:

mir is dative (indirect object)
die Musik is nominative (subject)

Even though mir comes first, die Musik is still the subject because of its nominative form.

German often places:

pronouns before full nouns,
dative objects before accusative objects,

especially when this sounds more natural rhythmically. So:

dass die Musik mir viel Gutes gibt (subject first)
dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt (pronoun first)

Both are grammatically correct. The second puts a slight emphasis on mir (“to me, personally”).

What exactly is viel Gutes? Why is Gutes capitalized?

viel Gutes literally means “a lot of good” or “many good things / a lot of goodness”.

Grammar-wise:

gut is an adjective = “good”.
Gutes is a nominalized adjective (an adjective turned into a noun) in the neuter form.
In German, when an adjective is used as a noun, it is capitalized.

So Gutes here = “good things / good stuff / goodness (in general)”.
The phrase viel Gutes can be translated naturally as:

“a lot of good things”
“a lot of good”
“many benefits”

Example:

Er hat viel Gutes getan. – “He has done a lot of good (things).”

What case is viel Gutes in, and why does it end in -es?

In dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt, viel Gutes is the direct object of gibt, so it is in the accusative case.

Because Gutes is:

neuter,
singular,
accusative,
and a nominalized adjective,

it takes the ending -es. This is the standard weak ending for neuter singular in many contexts.

You can think of it as similar to:

etwas Gutes – “something good”
nichts Gutes – “nothing good”
viel Gutes – “a lot of good (things)”

Is Die Musik gibt mir viel Gutes a common phrase, or is there a more usual way to say “the music does me a lot of good”?

Die Musik gibt mir viel Gutes is correct and understandable, but a bit more abstract or literary.

A very common and idiomatic way to express this idea is with gut tun:

Die Musik tut mir gut. – “The music is good for me.”
Die Musik tut mir sehr gut. – “The music does me a lot of good.”
Die Musik tut mir im Moment richtig gut. – “Right now, the music is really doing me good.”

Your sentence emphasizes what the music is giving (a lot of good things/benefits), rather than just “being good for me.”

Could we replace gibt with tut here, like ... dass mir die Musik viel Gutes tut?

Yes, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes tut is also grammatically correct, and quite natural.

Subtle difference:

gibt – stresses the idea of “giving” you many good things, benefits, or positive effects.
tut – focuses more on actions/effects the music has on you (what it does for you).

Both mean that the music benefits you a lot.
In practice, most native speakers would probably use:

..., dass mir die Musik richtig gut tut.
(“…that the music really does me good.”)

Why is there a comma before dass?

German uses commas more strictly than English.

A comma is mandatory before a subordinate clause introduced by dass.
The subordinate clause is dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

So the sentence must be written:

In diesem Augenblick merke ich, dass mir die Musik viel Gutes gibt.

You cannot omit that comma in standard written German.

Why is the present tense merke used when in English I would say “I am realizing”?

German usually does not form a separate present progressive tense. The simple present covers both:

English “I realize”
and “I am realizing”

So:

Ich merke, dass ...
can mean either “I realize that ...” or “I’m realizing that ...”, depending on context.

In diesem Augenblick merke ich, ... clearly refers to something unfolding right now, so in natural English translation you would often use the progressive:

“In this moment, I’m realizing that the music does me a lot of good.”