Log inSign up

Je li ovaj broj na računu ispravan, ili trebamo opet provjeriti?

Je li ovaj broj na računu ispravan, ili trebamo opet provjeriti?
Is this number on the bill correct, or do we need to check again?

Breakdown of Je li ovaj broj na računu ispravan, ili trebamo opet provjeriti?

biti
to be
trebati
to need
ili
or
na
on
račun
bill
opet
again
ovaj
this
provjeriti
to check
broj
number
ispravan
correct
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Questions & Answers about Je li ovaj broj na računu ispravan, ili trebamo opet provjeriti?

Why does the sentence start with Je li? Is that the normal way to form a yes/no question?

Yes. Je li is a very common (and fairly formal/neutral) way to form a yes/no question in Croatian.

  • je = the present tense of biti (to be), 3rd person singular (is)
  • li = a question particle (it signals that this is a question) So Je li ovaj broj…? literally functions like Is this number…?
    In everyday speech, you’ll also hear the contracted Je l’.
Could I also say Da li here, like in some other Slavic languages?

You can hear Da li in some regions and styles, but in standard Croatian it’s generally less preferred than Je li or simply rising intonation.
So for a learner aiming at standard Croatian, Je li is the safest choice.

Why is it ovaj broj and not some other form of ovaj?

Because broj is:

  • masculine
  • singular
  • nominative (it’s the subject of the clause)

So the demonstrative must agree:

  • ovaj (masc. nom. sg.) + broj (masc. nom. sg.)

If it were feminine (ova) or neuter (ovo), the form would change accordingly.

What case is na računu, and why?

na računu is locative singular. The preposition na often takes:

  • locative when it means location / “on, in, at” (static)
  • accusative when it implies movement to/onto (dynamic)

Here it’s static: the number is on the bill/account, so na + locative → na računu.

Does račun here mean bill, invoice, or bank account?

račun can mean several related things, and context decides:

  • račun = a bill/check (restaurant bill), invoice, or an account
  • na računu often means on the bill / on the invoice / on the receipt If the context is banking, you might clarify with bankovni račun (bank account). Otherwise, many learners will meet račun first as bill/receipt.
Why is ispravan in masculine form?

Because ispravan agrees with broj (masculine singular). This is a predicate adjective pattern:

  • Je li ovaj broj … ispravan? Literally: Is this number correct?
    If the noun were feminine, you’d get ispravna, etc.
Is there a difference between ispravan and točan here?

Often they’re both translated as correct, but the feel can differ:

  • točan = accurate, exact (often about facts, numbers, measurements)
  • ispravan = correct/valid/proper (often about whether something is right/acceptable/valid)

For a number on a bill, both can work, but točan broj can sound especially natural if you mean numerical accuracy, while ispravan can sound like the right one / valid.

Why is there a comma before ili?

Because it separates two coordinated alternatives:

  • Je li ovaj broj na računu ispravan, ili trebamo opet provjeriti?

In Croatian, a comma before ili is common when ili introduces an alternative clause (especially if the second part is a full clause). In short, the comma helps readability and reflects a slight pause in speech.

Why do we say trebamo (we need) instead of using an impersonal form like treba?

Both exist, but they emphasize slightly different things:

  • Trebamo opet provjeriti = We need to check again (explicitly includes the speakers as responsible)
  • Treba opet provjeriti = It needs to be checked again / One should check again (more impersonal, like instructions)

So trebamo is more direct and personal.

Do I need to include the pronoun mi (we), like mi trebamo?

Usually no. Croatian is a pro-drop language, so the verb ending already shows the person/number:

  • trebamo = we need

You might add mi only for emphasis or contrast, e.g. Mi trebamo provjeriti, a oni ne (We need to check, but they don’t).

Why is provjeriti in the infinitive, and not something like a finite verb form?

Because trebati is commonly followed by an infinitive to express necessity:

  • trebati + infinitive → trebamo provjeriti (we need to check)

That’s the standard construction for “need to do something.”

What’s the role and placement of opet? Could it move?

opet means again. Its position is flexible, but it changes emphasis slightly:

  • trebamo opet provjeriti = we need to check again (focus on repeating the action)
  • opet trebamo provjeriti = again we need to check (focus on this situation happening again) Both are grammatical; your original version is very natural.
Why is it provjeriti (perfective) and not provjeravati (imperfective)?

This is about aspect:

  • provjeriti (perfective) = check/verify once, complete the checking
  • provjeravati (imperfective) = be checking, check repeatedly/as a process

With opet and the idea of doing a single re-check, provjeriti is typically preferred. If you meant ongoing repeated checking, provjeravati could fit.

Any pronunciation pitfalls in this sentence for English speakers?

A few common ones:

  • računu: č is like a harder ch (as in church), not like ts.
  • li is unstressed and short; Je li often sounds like one unit.
  • broj: the r can sound stronger/rolled compared to English.
  • Stress is generally not on the last syllable; don’t force English-like stress patterns.