Die Unterstellung, dass ich dich hintergangen habe, ist einfach falsch.

Questions & Answers about Die Unterstellung, dass ich dich hintergangen habe, ist einfach falsch.

Why is the past participle hintergangen without a -ge- in the middle?
When the prefix hinter- is used figuratively to mean 'to deceive' or 'go behind someone's back,' it is inseparable. Inseparable verbs do not take the -ge- prefix in the past participle. If it were a literal, separable verb, it would be hintergegangen, but here it stays hintergangen.
How does the prefix hinter- change the meaning of gehen in this context?
The base verb gehen means 'to go.' The inseparable prefix hinter- often adds a semantic layer of secrecy, deceit, or doing something behind someone's back. Thus, hintergehen means to deceive or betray someone.
I see the noun Unterstellung (insinuation). Does the prefix unter- work similarly to hinter- here?
Yes! The noun comes from the verb unterstellen (to allege or insinuate). Just like with hintergehen, the prefix unter- is used inseparably here to create a figurative, abstract meaning, rather than a literal physical direction.
Why does hintergehen take the accusative pronoun dich?
While some German verbs relating to interpersonal harm or trust use the dative case (like schaden or vertrauen), hintergehen takes a direct object in the accusative case. You can think of it as directly deceiving someone, hence ich habe dich hintergangen.

Learn Die Unterstellung, dass ich dich hintergangen habe, ist einfach falsch and more in German

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free