Question 1

Since 'he was forced' happened in the past, why is the second verb اعتراف کند in the present subjunctive?

Accepted Answer

In Farsi, verbs of obligation like مجبور شدن (to be forced) are followed by که (that) and the present subjunctive, regardless of the tense of the main verb. The first verb, مجبور شد, tells us the event happened in the past, so the second verb اعتراف کند simply names the action he was obliged to do without needing its own past tense.

Question 2

The lesson teaches both مجبور بودن and مجبور شدن. Why does this sentence use شد instead of بود?

Accepted Answer

While مجبور بود describes a continuous state of being obliged (he had to), مجبور شد uses the verb شدن (to become) to emphasize a specific event or change in state. In this context, it highlights the exact moment he 'became forced' or was cornered into confessing by the situation.

Question 3

Why is the verb ندید negative (didn't see) when the English translation says 'Nobody saw him'?

Accepted Answer

Farsi requires double negatives. When you use a negative pronoun like هیچ‌کس (nobody), the verb in that clause must also be negative. So, هیچ‌کس او را ندید literally translates to 'Nobody didn't see him,' which is the standard and only correct way to express 'Nobody saw him' in Farsi.

Question 4

Why does درباره (about) have a ی added to the end of it here?

Accepted Answer

The word درباره acts as a preposition that needs an Ezāfe (the linking 'e' sound) to connect it to the noun it modifies. Because درباره ends in a spoken vowel, the consonant ی (ye) is added to bridge the gap smoothly, creating درباره‌ی آن ماجرا (about that incident).

هیچ‌کس او را ندید، اما مجبور شد که درباره‌ی آن ماجرا اعتراف کند.

Breakdown of هیچ‌کس او را ندید، اما مجبور شد که درباره‌ی آن ماجرا اعتراف کند.

Questions & Answers about هیچ‌کس او را ندید، اما مجبور شد که درباره‌ی آن ماجرا اعتراف کند.

Learn هیچ‌کس او را ندید، اما مجبور شد که درباره‌ی آن ماجرا اعتراف کند and more in Farsi