Questions & Answers about Die parel is haar te zwaar.
Why is haar used directly here instead of voor haar?
This sentence uses a dative complement with an evaluative adjective, which is the focus of this lesson. When you say something is 'too [adjective]' for someone, you can drop the preposition voor (for) and just use the indirect object pronoun (haar). Both Die parel is haar te zwaar and Die parel is te zwaar voor haar are correct and mean exactly the same thing.
If I use the dative pronoun, does it always go before the adjective?
Yes. In Dutch, indirect object pronouns like haar naturally sit early in the sentence, right after the finite verb (is) and before the adjective phrase (te zwaar). You cannot say 'Die parel is te zwaar haar'.
Does this dative structure only work with the word te (too)?
It is most strongly associated with words that express a subjective evaluation or limit, such as te (too) and genoeg (enough). The dative pronoun indicates whose limit is being crossed. If you simply wanted to say 'That pearl is heavy for her' (without the evaluative 'too'), you would normally revert to using the preposition: Die parel is zwaar voor haar.
Could I use this same structure with a person's name instead of the pronoun haar?