Question 1

Why do we use both zou and moeten to say "should" in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

In Dutch, the concept of "should" (expressing advice or a moral obligation) is usually made by combining the past tense of zullen (here, zou) with the infinitive moeten. It literally translates closer to "would have to". Since this is a main clause, the conjugated verb zou takes the second position in the sentence, pushing the remaining verbs (moeten zijn) to the very end.

Question 2

Why is the ending verb cluster moeten zijn instead of zijn moeten?

Accepted Answer

When you have multiple infinitive verbs at the end of a sentence, Dutch often allows two different orders. However, putting the modal verb first, like moeten zijn, is much more common and sounds far more natural to native speakers than the alternative.

Question 3

Why is it morele instead of moreel?

Accepted Answer

The word beslissing is a de-word. When an adjective comes before a de-word, it always gets an -e ending, even if it follows the indefinite article een. Notice also a spelling rule at play: the double vowel in moreel drops to a single vowel in morele to keep the syllable open and the vowel sound exactly the same.

Question 4

Could I use eerlijk instead of rechtvaardig here?

Accepted Answer

You could, but the nuance shifts slightly. Eerlijk usually means honest or fair in everyday situations, like telling the truth or playing a game fairly. Rechtvaardig is a stronger, more formal word that implies true justice and righteousness, which fits perfectly with the serious tone of a moral decision.

Een morele beslissing zou altijd rechtvaardig moeten zijn.

Breakdown of Een morele beslissing zou altijd rechtvaardig moeten zijn.

Questions & Answers about Een morele beslissing zou altijd rechtvaardig moeten zijn.

Learn Een morele beslissing zou altijd rechtvaardig moeten zijn and more in Dutch