Questions & Answers about In het graf was een oud bot gevonden.
Why does the Dutch sentence use was ... gevonden for 'had been found' instead of a literal translation of 'had been'?
In Dutch, perfect passive tenses are built using the helping verb zijn (to be) rather than hebben (to have). To form the past perfect passive, you use the past tense of zijn, which is was (or waren for plural), plus the past participle gevonden. English speakers often want to use a literal translation like 'had geweest', but in Dutch, was gevonden is all you need for 'had been found'.
If I wanted to say 'An old bone was found' (simple past passive), how would this sentence change?
You would change the helping verb from zijn to worden. The past tense of worden is werd, so the sentence would become: In het graf werd een oud bot gevonden. Remember: worden/werd is for the simple passive ('is/was found'), while is/was is for the perfect passive ('has/had been found').
Why is the verb was placed before the subject een oud bot?
Because the sentence starts with the prepositional phrase In het graf. When a Dutch main clause begins with anything other than the subject, the subject and the verb swap places. This rule is called inversion, resulting in the word order: [Starting phrase] + [Verb] + [Subject].
Why is the adjective oud missing the usual -e ending here?