Le Subjonctif Présent: Formation | French Grammar

The French subjonctif présent sounds intimidating until you learn the trick: most of it is built from a form you already know — the third-person plural of the present indicative — with a small set of endings that overlap heavily with the indicative for the singular and 3pl, and overlap with the imparfait for nous and vous. Once you have the core rule, dozens of verbs become predictable. The irregularities cluster around a small group of stem-changing verbs (prendre, venir, tenir, boire, devoir, recevoir, voir, etc.) that follow a consistent secondary pattern.

This page walks through the construction step by step: the core rule, the regular paradigms across all three verb groups, the nous/vous twist for stem-changing verbs, and the recognition habits that let you produce the right form on the fly. The genuine irregulars — être, avoir, aller, faire, savoir, pouvoir, vouloir, falloir, valoir, pleuvoir — live on a separate page: see Le Subjonctif: Irregular Stems.

The core rule

Most French verbs follow a single rule for the subjunctive present.

Take the ils/elles form of the present indicative. Drop the -ent. Add the subjonctif endings: -e, -es, -e, -ions, -iez, -ent.

The endings are fixed. They do not vary by verb group. The whole game is finding the right stem.

Person	Ending
que je	-e
que tu	-es
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	-e
que nous	-ions
que vous	-iez
qu'ils / qu'elles	-ent

Notice that the endings for nous and vous are -ions and -iez — exactly the same as the imparfait. The endings for the singular and the third-person plural are exactly the same as the indicative present of -er verbs (je parle, tu parles, il parle, ils parlent). This overlap means that for -er verbs, the singular and 3pl forms of the subjonctif présent are spelled identically to the indicative present. The mood difference shows up only in the syntactic frame (the que-clause and the trigger verb), not in the form itself.

💡

For -er verbs, four out of six subjunctive forms are visually identical to the present indicative. Only nous and vous reveal the subjunctive on its own. This means you can use the subjunctive of -er verbs without "thinking subjunctive" most of the time — the form just falls out of the indicative knowledge you already have.

Regular paradigms by group

Let us walk through one verb from each of the three regular groups, then through a stem-alternating verb that follows the secondary rule.

First group (-er verbs): parler

Present indicative: ils parlent. Drop -ent → stem parl-.

Person	Form
que je	parle
que tu	parles
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	parle
que nous	parlions
que vous	parliez
qu'ils / qu'elles	parlent

Il faut que je parle au directeur avant la fin de la semaine.

I need to talk to the director before the end of the week.

Mes parents veulent que nous parlions plus souvent.

My parents want us to speak more often.

C'est important que vous parliez français à la maison.

It's important that you speak French at home.

The four singular and 3pl forms (parle, parles, parle, parlent) are spelled identically to the indicative. The nous and vous forms (parlions, parliez) carry the subjunctive marking and are also identical to the imparfait nous parlions, vous parliez. So in writing, the only forms that distinguish the subjunctive of an -er verb from existing forms of the indicative are... none of them. The subjunctive is recognized purely by the syntactic context (the que-clause and the trigger).

Second group (-ir verbs with -iss-): finir

Present indicative: ils finissent. Drop -ent → stem finiss-.

Person	Form
que je	finisse
que tu	finisses
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	finisse
que nous	finissions
que vous	finissiez
qu'ils / qu'elles	finissent

Il faut que je finisse mon rapport avant ce soir.

I need to finish my report by tonight.

On reste jusqu'à ce qu'ils finissent leur partie d'échecs.

We're staying until they finish their chess game.

Mon patron exige que nous finissions le projet en deux semaines.

My boss is demanding that we finish the project in two weeks.

For second-group verbs, the -iss- infix appears in every form of the subjunctive present, just as it does in the nous/vous/ils forms of the indicative present and throughout the imparfait. This makes the subjunctive of -ir verbs visually distinctive — once you see finisse in a que-clause, you know it is the subjunctive.

Third group (-re verbs): vendre

Present indicative: ils vendent. Drop -ent → stem vend-.

Person	Form
que je	vende
que tu	vendes
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	vende
que nous	vendions
que vous	vendiez
qu'ils / qu'elles	vendent

Je veux que tu vendes ta vieille voiture.

I want you to sell your old car.

Il faut qu'on vende l'appartement avant la fin de l'année.

We need to sell the apartment before the end of the year.

Bien qu'ils vendent leur maison, ils restent dans le quartier.

Even though they're selling their house, they're staying in the neighborhood.

The pattern is the same: take the ils present, drop -ent, add the endings. Vendre is fully predictable from the rule.

The nous/vous twist: stem-alternating verbs

Some verbs alternate their stem in the present indicative — the singular and 3pl take one stem, the nous/vous take a different one. The subjunctive preserves this alternation: the singular and 3pl subjunctive forms use the 3pl stem, while the nous and vous subjunctive forms use the nous-present stem (which is also the imparfait stem).

This is the rule French textbooks state opaquely. Here it is in plain terms:

For verbs whose present indicative uses different stems for the singular/3pl and the nous/vous forms, the subjunctive uses both stems — the 3pl stem for singular and 3pl subjunctive, the nous stem for nous and vous subjunctive.

The classic example is prendre:

Present indicative: je prends, tu prends, il prend, nous prenons, vous prenez, ils prennent.
Two stems: singular/3pl uses prenn- (from ils prennent); nous/vous uses pren- (from nous prenons).
Subjunctive: que je prenne, que tu prennes, qu'il prenne, que nous prenions, que vous preniez, qu'ils prennent.

Person	Form	Stem
que je	prenne	prenn- (from ils prennent)
que tu	prennes	prenn-
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	prenne	prenn-
que nous	prenions	pren- (from nous prenons / imparfait)
que vous	preniez	pren-
qu'ils / qu'elles	prennent	prenn-

Il faut que tu prennes une décision rapidement.

You need to make a decision quickly.

Mon père veut que nous prenions le train et non l'avion.

My father wants us to take the train, not the plane.

J'aimerais qu'ils prennent leur travail au sérieux.

I'd like them to take their work seriously.

The same alternation runs through the whole prendre family — apprendre, comprendre, surprendre, reprendre, entreprendre. Each verb in the family follows the same two-stem pattern.

The full list of stem-alternating verbs

Here are the most common verbs that follow the two-stem pattern. The first column is the singular/3pl stem (from ils-present); the second is the nous/vous stem (from nous-present, which is also the imparfait stem).

Verb	Singular & 3pl stem	nous / vous stem
prendre	prenn-	pren-
venir	vienn-	ven-
tenir	tienn-	ten-
boire	boiv-	buv-
devoir	doiv-	dev-
recevoir	reçoiv-	recev-
voir	voi-	voy-
croire	croi-	croy-
envoyer	envoi-	envoy-
nettoyer	nettoi-	nettoy-
jeter	jett-	jet-
appeler	appell-	appel-

Each of these gives a six-form subjunctive paradigm that mixes the two stems exactly as prendre does. Let us drill three of them in full.

venir

Person	Form
que je	vienne
que tu	viennes
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	vienne
que nous	venions
que vous	veniez
qu'ils / qu'elles	viennent

Mes amis veulent que je vienne avec eux ce week-end.

My friends want me to come with them this weekend.

On va attendre qu'ils viennent avant de commencer.

We're going to wait until they come before starting.

Il est préférable que vous veniez en transport en commun.

It's preferable for you to come by public transit.

boire

Person	Form
que je	boive
que tu	boives
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	boive
que nous	buvions
que vous	buviez
qu'ils / qu'elles	boivent

Le médecin veut que je boive plus d'eau.

The doctor wants me to drink more water.

Il faut qu'on boive moins de café le soir.

We need to drink less coffee in the evening.

C'est important que les enfants boivent du lait.

It's important that children drink milk.

devoir

Person	Form
que je	doive
que tu	doives
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	doive
que nous	devions
que vous	deviez
qu'ils / qu'elles	doivent

Je ne veux pas que tu doives travailler ce soir.

I don't want you to have to work tonight.

C'est dommage qu'on doive partir si tôt.

It's too bad we have to leave so early.

Verbs in -yer: another two-stem case

Verbs ending in -oyer and -uyer (and conditionally -ayer) follow the same logic, with a y in the nous/vous stem.

For envoyer:

Person	Form
que j'	envoie
que tu	envoies
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	envoie
que nous	envoyions
que vous	envoyiez
qu'ils / qu'elles	envoient

J'aimerais que tu m'envoies les photos par mail.

I'd like you to send me the photos by email.

Il faut qu'on envoie les invitations cette semaine.

We need to send the invitations this week.

Bien que nous envoyions des messages presque tous les jours, on ne se voit jamais.

Even though we send messages almost every day, we never see each other.

The nous and vous forms — que nous envoyions, que vous envoyiez — have a y immediately followed by i that some learners mistype or omit. The spelling is correct: the y is part of the stem (envoy-), the i is part of the ending (-ions).

Verbs in -e_er and -é_er

A few first-group verbs alternate between a silent e in the singular/3pl and a sounded e (or è) in the nous/vous form: appeler/appelle/appelons, jeter/jette/jetons, mener/mène/menons, acheter/achète/achetons. These follow the standard rule but preserve the orthographic alternation.

For acheter:

Person	Form
que j'	achète
que tu	achètes
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	achète
que nous	achetions
que vous	achetiez
qu'ils / qu'elles	achètent

Mes parents préfèrent que j'achète une voiture d'occasion.

My parents prefer that I buy a used car.

Il faut qu'on achète du pain en rentrant.

We need to buy bread on the way home.

For appeler:

Person	Form
que j'	appelle
que tu	appelles
qu'il / qu'elle / qu'on	appelle
que nous	appelions
que vous	appeliez
qu'ils / qu'elles	appellent

J'aimerais qu'on s'appelle plus souvent.

I'd like us to call each other more often.

The doubled l in appelle mirrors the indicative present j'appelle; the simple l in nous appelions mirrors nous appelons.

A clarifying observation: the imparfait/subjunctive overlap

It will already have struck you that the nous and vous subjunctive forms of the regular pattern are identical to the imparfait for almost every verb.

Person	Imparfait	Subjonctif présent
nous parlions	nous parlions	que nous parlions (identical)
vous parliez	vous parliez	que vous parliez (identical)
nous prenions	nous prenions	que nous prenions (identical)
nous venions	nous venions	que nous venions (identical)

This is not a coincidence. Both tenses use the nous-present stem (minus -ons) plus a related set of endings. The visual collision means the form by itself does not tell you which tense it is — you need the syntactic context.

In practice, this rarely causes a problem: an imparfait nous parlions sits in a regular sentence, while a subjunctive que nous parlions sits inside a que-clause after a trigger. Reading attentively makes the distinction obvious.

The two tenses do not collide for the singular and 3pl forms, where the imparfait has -ais, -ait, -aient and the subjunctive has -e, -es, -e, -ent.

Putting it together: a sentence-by-sentence drill

To lock the formation rules in, here are nine sentences across the three verb groups and the stem-alternating cases. Each one shows a high-frequency trigger paired with the correct subjunctive form.

Il faut que je finisse cette tâche avant cinq heures.

I need to finish this task before five.

Mon professeur veut que nous écrivions un essai de mille mots.

My teacher wants us to write a thousand-word essay.

Je suis content que tu connaisses mon frère.

I'm glad you know my brother.

Bien qu'on prenne le métro tous les jours, on ne croise jamais personne qu'on connaît.

Even though we take the metro every day, we never run into anyone we know.

Il vaudrait mieux que tu lises les instructions avant de commencer.

It would be better for you to read the instructions before starting.

Pour que tout le monde comprenne, je vais répéter en français lent.

So that everyone understands, I'll repeat in slow French.

J'attends qu'il revienne pour lui parler.

I'm waiting for him to come back so I can talk to him.

C'est dommage que tu partes si tôt — la fête vient de commencer.

It's a shame you're leaving so early — the party just started.

Il est essentiel qu'on suive les consignes de sécurité.

It's essential that we follow the safety guidelines.

Note the variety of triggers (il faut que, mon professeur veut que, je suis content que, bien que, il vaudrait mieux que, pour que, j'attends que, c'est dommage que, il est essentiel que) and the variety of verbs (finir, écrire, connaître, prendre, lire, comprendre, revenir, partir, suivre). The rule is the same in every case: 3pl present, drop -ent, add the endings (with the nous/vous twist where needed).

Recognition habits

Once the formation rules are clear, the practical question becomes: how do I produce the subjunctive on the fly when I am speaking? Two habits help.

Habit 1: When you hear yourself begin a sentence with a known subjunctive trigger (il faut que, je veux que, bien que, pour que, avant que, il faudrait que), commit immediately to the subjunctive. Do not finish the sentence in the indicative and try to repair it. Rehearse trigger phrases until your mouth produces the subjunctive automatically after them.

Habit 2: When you produce the form, recall the ils-present. If you can say ils prennent without thinking, you can build que je prenne on the fly. The 3pl indicative is the bridge to the singular and 3pl subjunctive forms; the nous indicative is the bridge to nous/vous subjunctive forms.

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Using the nous-present stem for the singular forms of stem-alternating verbs.

❌ Il faut que je prene une décision.

Wrong: the singular/3pl subjunctive uses the 3pl stem (prenn-), not the nous stem (pren-). The form is que je prenne.

✅ Il faut que je prenne le train de huit heures.

I need to take the eight o'clock train.

Mistake 2: Using the ils-present stem for the nous/vous forms of stem-alternating verbs.

❌ Il faut que nous prennions une décision.

Wrong: the nous/vous subjunctive of stem-alternating verbs uses the nous-present stem. The form is que nous prenions.

✅ Il faut que nous prenions une décision.

We need to make a decision.

Mistake 3: Forgetting the -iss- infix for second-group verbs.

❌ Il faut que je finie ce livre.

Wrong: -ir verbs of the finir group keep the -iss- in the subjunctive — finisse.

✅ Il faut que je finisse ce livre.

I need to finish this book.

Mistake 4: Confusing imparfait and subjunctive for nous/vous in writing.

❌ Je veux que nous parlons français à table.

Wrong: que requires the subjunctive — parlions. (The form looks identical to the imparfait but is required by the subjunctive trigger.)

✅ Je veux que nous parlions français à table.

I want us to speak French at the table.

Mistake 5: Using the indicative prennent in the nous slot by analogy.

❌ Bien que nous prennions notre temps, on n'a pas fini.

Wrong: nous prennions doesn't exist. The correct form is que nous prenions (with -en-, not -enn-).

✅ Bien que nous prenions notre temps, on n'a pas fini.

Even though we're taking our time, we haven't finished.

Key takeaways

The core rule: take the ils/elles present, drop -ent, add -e, -es, -e, -ions, -iez, -ent.
The endings are fixed across all verb groups. The whole game is finding the stem.
Stem-alternating verbs (prendre, venir, tenir, boire, devoir, recevoir, voir, croire, envoyer, acheter, appeler) use two stems: the ils-present stem for singular and 3pl subjunctive, the nous-present stem (= imparfait stem) for nous/vous subjunctive.
For -er verbs, four out of six subjunctive forms are spelled identically to the indicative; only the nous/vous forms are visually distinctive (and they coincide with the imparfait).
The -iss- of second-group verbs is preserved throughout the subjunctive — que je finisse, not que je finie.
The genuine irregulars (être, avoir, aller, faire, savoir, pouvoir, vouloir, valoir, falloir, pleuvoir) are covered separately and must be memorized.

Now practice French

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning French→