Breakdown of Bu fuzuli harcamayı onaylamamıştım; bütçemiz olmadığından değil, yeni bir gider istemediğimden.
bu
this
bir
a / an
yeni
new
değil
not
olmak
to be
istemek
to want / to require / to call for
onaylamak
to approve
bütçe
budget
fuzuli
superfluous
harcama
expenditure
gider
expense
Questions & Answers about Bu fuzuli harcamayı onaylamamıştım; bütçemiz olmadığından değil, yeni bir gider istemediğimden.
How does olmadığından değil form the meaning "not because we didn't have"?
This uses the negative causal structure: verb + -dığı + ablative (-ndan) + değil. Here, ol- (to be/exist) takes the negative -ma-, the nominalizer -dığ-, the 3rd-person singular possessive -ı (creating "its not existing"), and the ablative -ndan (meaning "from" or "because of"). Adding değil negates the whole reason, making it "not because of its non-existence."
If the English translation says "we didn't have a budget", why does olmadığından use the 3rd-person singular possessive (-ı) instead of the 1st-person plural (-ımız)?
In Turkish, "having" is often expressed with things existing or not existing. The literal translation of this clause is "not because our budget (bütçemiz) did not exist (olmadığından)." Since "our budget" is a 3rd-person entity (it), the verb takes the 3rd-person possessive -ı, not the "we" form.
How does istemediğimden complete the "not because X, but because Y" structure?
After ruling out the first reason with olmadığından değil, the sentence provides the real reason by using the same ablative causal structure without değil. İstemediğimden breaks down as iste-me-diğ-im-den (because of my not wanting). The word "but" is smoothly implied simply by placing the two clauses next to each other.
Why is the main verb onaylamamıştım in the past perfect ("hadn't approved") rather than the simple past (onaylamadım)?
The -mıştı suffix (past perfect) is used for actions completed before another past event or to establish background context. Here, the speaker is explaining the past reasoning behind a decision that had already been firmly settled. Using onaylamamıştım emphasizes a prior, completed state better than the simple past would.
Are harcama and gider interchangeable here?
They are very similar, but have a slight difference in nuance. Harcama refers to the act of spending or a specific expenditure (from harcamak, to spend). Gider is an accounting term for an "expense" in a budget. Using both avoids repetition and sounds natural in a financial context.
Learn Bu fuzuli harcamayı onaylamamıştım; bütçemiz olmadığından değil, yeni bir gider istemediğimden and more in Turkish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free