Makinist gelmiyor mu, boşuna mı bekliyoruz?

Questions & Answers about Makinist gelmiyor mu, boşuna mı bekliyoruz?

The current lesson is about the "geleceği yok" structure. How could we rewrite the first clause to say "It looks like the driver has no intention of coming"?
You would use the structure Verb + -(y)AcAk + possessive + yok. So, makinist gelmiyor becomes makinistin geleceği yok (the driver has no intention of coming). Notice that makinist takes the genitive suffix (-in) here because it grammatically "owns" the action of coming.
Why is the question particle placed before bekliyoruz instead of at the very end (bekliyoruz mu)?
In Turkish, the question particle mı/mi/mu/mü goes immediately after the word you want to emphasize. By saying boşuna mı bekliyoruz?, you are emphasizing "in vain" (Are we waiting in vain?). If you said boşuna bekliyoruz mu?, the focus would awkwardly be on the action of waiting.
I know boş means "empty", but how is the adverb boşuna (in vain) formed?
It is a fixed, fossilized word made from boş (empty) + -u (third-person possessive) + -n- (buffer) + -a (dative case). Literally, it meant "to its emptiness," but today it functions entirely as a single everyday adverb meaning "in vain" or "for nothing."
There is no conjunction like yoksa (or else / otherwise) between these two questions. Is that normal?
Yes, connecting two closely related questions with just a comma is very common in conversational Turkish. You could say Makinist gelmiyor mu, yoksa boşuna mı bekliyoruz?, but dropping the conjunction keeps the sentence punchy and perfectly natural.

Learn Makinist gelmiyor mu, boşuna mı bekliyoruz and more in Turkish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free