Jag skulle skratta till, men det gjorde jag inte.
I was going to let out a short laugh, but I didn't.
Breakdown of Jag skulle skratta till, men det gjorde jag inte.
jag
I
det
it (neuter)
inte
not
göra
to do, to make
Questions & Answers about Jag skulle skratta till, men det gjorde jag inte.
What does the word till add to the verb skratta here?
The particle till changes the meaning from just laughing (skratta) to letting out a sudden, brief, or involuntary laugh. It acts as an aspectual particle, meaning it changes the shape of the action rather than its physical direction. You will often see it attached to verbs to show a quick burst of action, like rycka till (flinch) or skrika till (let out a yelp).
Why is skulle used here to mean "was going to"?
skulle is the past tense form of ska (will/shall). When used in this way, it expresses an unfulfilled intention in the past, translating perfectly to "was going to" or "was about to". The speaker intended to let out a laugh, but the second half of the sentence clarifies that it did not actually happen.
Why does the second part say det gjorde jag inte instead of just jag gjorde inte?
In Swedish, you cannot leave a helper verb like gjorde (did) hanging without an object if it is replacing a whole action. The pronoun det (that/it) steps in to represent the entire previously mentioned action of letting out a laugh. So you are literally saying "but that did I not".
Why is the word order gjorde jag rather than jag gjorde in the second clause?