Breakdown of Om jag hade sparat pappersarket, skulle jag göra en båt idag.
jag
I
en
a, an (common)
idag
today
ha
to have
Questions & Answers about Om jag hade sparat pappersarket, skulle jag göra en båt idag.
Why do we use hade sparat in the first half but skulle göra (instead of skulle ha gjort) in the second half?
This is a mixed conditional sentence. The condition is something that didn't happen in the past, so we use the past perfect (hade sparat). But the hypothetical result applies to the present time (idag), so we use skulle + the present infinitive (göra). If the result was also in the past ("I would have made a boat yesterday"), you would use skulle ha gjort.
Why is the word order skulle jag göra and not jag skulle göra after the comma?
This is the V2 (verb-second) rule in action. The entire conditional clause (Om jag hade sparat pappersarket) counts as the first block of information in the main sentence. To keep the main verb in the second position, skulle must come immediately after the comma, pushing the subject (jag) to the spot right after it.
What exactly makes up the word pappersarket?
It is a compound noun meaning "the sheet of paper". It is built from papper (paper) + an -s- connector + arket (the definite form of ett ark, meaning a single sheet). Using this instead of just papperet (the paper) emphasizes that it is a specific, physical sheet—which is exactly what you need to fold a paper boat!
Can I express this condition without using the word om?