Efter att ha kammat sig och fönat håret var hon klar.

Questions & Answers about Efter att ha kammat sig och fönat håret var hon klar.

Why do we say "ha kammat" here instead of just using the past tense "kammade"?
This is the perfect infinitive construction. When you want to express "after doing [X]" to show that one action was completed before another in the past, Swedish literally says "after to have done [X]". So, we use efter att ha followed by the supinum form (kammat).
Why is there no "ha" before "fönat"? Should it be "och ha fönat"?
You don't need to repeat ha. When you have two verbs joined by och (and) that share the same helping verb, you can drop the second helping verb to sound more natural. ...ha kammat sig och fönat... is the standard way to say this.
Why does she comb "herself" (sig) but blow-dry "the hair" (håret) instead of "her hair" (sitt hår)?
Kamma is commonly used as a reflexive verb (kamma sig - to comb one's hair), which is why we need sig. For the blow-drying, Swedish prefers using the definite form for body parts and clothing (håret - the hair) rather than a possessive pronoun like sitt (her own), because it's already obvious whose hair it is.
Why is the word order "var hon klar" instead of "hon var klar" at the end?
This is the V2 (verb-second) rule in action! The entire long phrase Efter att ha kammat sig och fönat håret counts as the first "block" of information in the sentence. Because the main verb must come in the second position, var comes next, pushing the subject hon to the third position.

Learn Efter att ha kammat sig och fönat håret var hon klar and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free