No creía que el crucero hubiera terminado tan mal.

Questions & Answers about No creía que el crucero hubiera terminado tan mal.

Why do we use the Past Perfect Subjunctive (hubiera terminado) here?
There are two things happening here. First, No creía que... (I didn't believe that...) is a negated belief in the past, which triggers the subjunctive mood. Second, the cruise ending happened before the past moment when you didn't believe it. To express a "past before a past" in the subjunctive, we use the Past Perfect Subjunctive: the imperfect subjunctive of the auxiliary verb haber (hubiera) plus the past participle (terminado).
Could I use hubiese terminado instead?
Yes! The imperfect subjunctive of haber has two valid forms: hubiera and hubiese. You can use them interchangeably, so No creía que el crucero hubiese terminado tan mal is completely correct and means the exact same thing.
If I wanted to say "I did believe that the cruise had ended so badly", would I still use the subjunctive?
No. Affirmative verbs of belief or thought (like creer and pensar) declare what you consider to be a fact, so they require the indicative mood. You would use the Past Perfect Indicative instead: Creía que el crucero había terminado tan mal. It is strictly the negation (No creía que...) that introduces doubt and triggers the subjunctive.
Why is it tan mal (so badly) instead of tanto mal?
Tan is used before adjectives and adverbs (like the adverb mal here) to mean "so". Tanto means "so much" or "so many" and is used before nouns or after verbs. Because you are modifying an adverb to describe how it ended, you must use tan.

Learn No creía que el crucero hubiera terminado tan mal and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free