Con este relámpago, está claro que la tormenta está para empezar.

Questions & Answers about Con este relámpago, está claro que la tormenta está para empezar.

Why is está para empezar used here instead of está por empezar?
In Spain, estar para followed by an infinitive expresses that an event is imminent or just about to happen, which fits perfectly for a storm about to break. Estar por followed by an infinitive is usually used for personal intentions, meaning to be in the mood to do something, or to indicate that a task remains to be done.
Why does está claro que take the indicative mood (está) rather than the subjunctive?
Expressions of certainty or obviousness, like está claro que (it is clear that) or es evidente que, trigger the indicative because they declare a fact. If the phrase were negative, such as no está claro que, it would introduce doubt and require the subjunctive.
What is the difference between relámpago and rayo?
Relámpago refers to the flash of light you see in the sky, while a rayo is the actual lightning bolt that strikes the ground. Since the speaker is noticing the visual flash indicating the storm is near, relámpago is the most accurate word.
Could I say está a punto de empezar instead?
Yes! Estar a punto de is a very common synonym for estar para when talking about something that is about to happen. Both are perfectly natural ways to express imminent action in Spain.

Learn Con este relámpago, está claro que la tormenta está para empezar and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free