Question 1

Is there a difference between using por lo tanto and por eso in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

They are very similar, but por lo tanto (therefore) is slightly more formal and emphasizes a logical deduction. Por eso (that's why / for that reason) is more conversational and focuses on a simple cause and effect. Both work perfectly here.

Question 2

Why does the sentence use en el sol instead of al sol?

Accepted Answer

You will actually hear both in Latin America. However, al sol is often preferred by native speakers when talking about exposure to sunlight (like a plant or a person sitting outside). While en el sol can technically mean being physically on the sun, in everyday speech it is frequently used interchangeably with al sol to mean "in the sunshine."

Question 3

I usually see prosperar used for businesses or economies. Is it common to use it for plants?

Accepted Answer

Yes! While it often translates to "prosper" for finances or business, when applied to plants, animals, or ecosystems, prosperar means "to thrive" or "to flourish." It is the standard, natural verb to describe a plant growing vigorously in its ideal environment.

Question 4

Could the adjective go before the noun here, as in indirecta luz?

Accepted Answer

No, it needs to be luz indirecta. In Spanish, adjectives that classify or distinguish a noun from others (like specifying indirect light as opposed to direct light) almost always come after the noun. Placing an adjective before the noun is usually reserved for poetic descriptions or emphasizing an expected, inherent quality.

El musgo necesita luz indirecta; por lo tanto, no prosperará en el sol.

Breakdown of El musgo necesita luz indirecta; por lo tanto, no prosperará en el sol.

Questions & Answers about El musgo necesita luz indirecta; por lo tanto, no prosperará en el sol.

Learn El musgo necesita luz indirecta; por lo tanto, no prosperará en el sol and more in Spanish