Question 1

Why does this sentence use the indicative "es" instead of the subjunctive "sea" after "tal vez"?

Accepted Answer

Both are grammatically correct, but the mood changes the degree of certainty. Using the indicative (es) implies the speaker feels this is a strong possibility. If they had used the subjunctive (sea), it would express more doubt or a lower probability that the man is actually a scammer.

Question 2

I learned that we drop "un" when saying what someone's job is, like "es médico". Why is there an "un" in "es un estafador"?

Accepted Answer

You drop the article for objective professions or affiliations, like occupations and nationalities. However, "estafador" (scammer) is an evaluative noun. When you use nouns that judge someone's character or apply a negative label, you keep the "un" or "una".

Question 3

Does "estafador" refer to a specific type of criminal?

Accepted Answer

Yes, it comes from the verb "estafar" (to swindle or defraud). An "estafador" is a con artist or fraudster—specifically someone who tricks people out of their money through deception, rather than a burglar or a violent criminal.

Question 4

This lesson covers exclamatory structures. How could I use this sentence's vocabulary with the "¡la de... que!" structure?

Accepted Answer

You could turn this into an exclamation about the high number of people he scams by saying: "¡La de personas que estafa ese hombre!" (The amount of people that man scams!). Using "¡la de + [noun] + que...!" is a native-sounding way to emphasize an extreme quantity.

Tal vez ese hombre es un estafador.

Breakdown of Tal vez ese hombre es un estafador.

Questions & Answers about Tal vez ese hombre es un estafador.

Learn Tal vez ese hombre es un estafador and more in Spanish