Llenamos la despensa por si acaso llega la tormenta.

Questions & Answers about Llenamos la despensa por si acaso llega la tormenta.

Why do we use the present indicative llega here instead of the subjunctive? I thought "in case" implied doubt about the future.
In Spanish, por si and por si acaso take the indicative, not the subjunctive, when referring to a possible future event. You are taking a real action now based on a possibility, so you use the present indicative llega. You will almost never use the present subjunctive after por si.
Could I say por si acaso la tormenta llega instead of putting the verb first?
Yes, but putting the verb first (llega la tormenta) sounds much more natural. In Spanish, verbs of arrival, appearance, or occurrence usually go before the subject, especially when the subject is a thing rather than a specific person.
Is there any difference between using por si and por si acaso?
They both mean "in case" and follow the exact same grammar rules. Adding acaso just makes the phrase slightly more emphatic, translating closer to "just in case" rather than simply "in case."
Llenamos can mean either "we fill" or "we filled." If the English translation was "We filled the pantry," how would the rest of the sentence change?
If llenamos was past tense, the precautionary action happened in the past. To match this timeline, the present indicative llega would change to the imperfect indicative llegaba, making the sentence Llenamos la despensa por si acaso llegaba la tormenta (We filled the pantry in case the storm arrived).

Learn Llenamos la despensa por si acaso llega la tormenta and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free