Breakdown of El hecho de que la zona rural pierda población es alarmante.
ser
to be
de
from / of
perder
to lose
que
that / than
la zona
zone / area
la población
the population
el hecho
the fact (de hecho: in fact)
alarmante
alarming
rural
rural
Questions & Answers about El hecho de que la zona rural pierda población es alarmante.
Why does this sentence use the subjunctive (pierda) after el hecho de que when we are talking about a literal fact?
This is a major hurdle for English speakers! Even though a fact is undeniably true, Spanish uses the subjunctive here because the sentence is reacting to the fact, not just declaring it. You aren't just stating that people are leaving; you are expressing a value judgment (that it is alarming). When a fact is the subject of an emotional reaction or judgment like this, the clause following el hecho de que takes the subjunctive.
Why is there no article before población? In English we might say 'losing its population'.
In Spanish, when talking about an uncountable noun in a general, non-specific sense, the article is often dropped. This matches the English translation 'losing population'. If you said pierda la población, it would sound like the rural area is misplacing a specific, previously identified group of people.
Could I just use el campo instead of la zona rural?
Learn El hecho de que la zona rural pierda población es alarmante and more in Spanish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free