Breakdown of El palacio fue restaurado el año pasado.
ser
to be
el año
year
el palacio
the palace
pasado
past / last
Questions & Answers about El palacio fue restaurado el año pasado.
Why do we use fue here instead of estuvo?
In Spanish, the true passive voice (an action being done to the subject) uses the verb ser. Here, fue restaurado focuses on the event: the action of restoring happened to the palace. If we used estuvo restaurado, it would describe the resulting state of the palace after the work was already finished, using estar to show a condition rather than the action itself.
Does the word restaurado change depending on what was restored?
Yes! When forming the passive voice with ser, the past participle acts like an adjective. It must agree in gender and number with the subject receiving the action. Since el palacio is masculine and singular, we use restaurado. If we were talking about a house (la casa), it would be la casa fue restaurada.
Why is fue used instead of era?
We use the preterite fue because the restoration is viewed as a single, completed event tied to a specific past timeframe (el año pasado). If we used the imperfect era, it would imply a repeated, ongoing, or habitual action in the past, which wouldn't make much sense for restoring a single building.
The current lesson mentions adding por to these sentences, but it is missing here. Is it still passive voice?