Question 1

Why is the sentence structured as fue pintado instead of just saying the king painted it?

Accepted Answer

This sentence uses the analytic passive voice to put the focus on the object receiving the action (Ese retrato) rather than who did it. To form this, we use the verb ser in the past tense (fue) followed by a past participle (pintado).

Question 2

Why does pintado end in -o here? Does it ever change?

Accepted Answer

Yes, it can change! In the analytic passive voice, the past participle (pintado) acts like an adjective. It must agree in gender and number with the subject it describes. Since retrato is a masculine singular noun, we use pintado. If the subject were feminine, like la pared (the wall), it would be fue pintada.

Question 3

I always mix up por and para. Why is it por el rey here?

Accepted Answer

In passive voice sentences, por is always used to mean 'by' when introducing the agent, which is the person or thing performing the action. Because the king is the one who actually painted the portrait, he is introduced with por.

Question 4

Why is the first word Ese and not Eso?

Accepted Answer

Ese is the masculine singular adjective for 'that', used directly before masculine singular nouns like retrato. Eso is the neuter pronoun, which is used for abstract ideas or unknown things, but it is never placed directly in front of a noun.

Question 5

Could we use era pintado instead of fue pintado?

Accepted Answer

Usually not for a single painting. We use the preterite fue because painting this specific portrait was a one-time, completed action. Using the imperfect era would imply the portrait was being painted repeatedly or over a continuous, unspecified period in the past.

Ese retrato fue pintado por el rey.

Breakdown of Ese retrato fue pintado por el rey.

Questions & Answers about Ese retrato fue pintado por el rey.

Learn Ese retrato fue pintado por el rey and more in Spanish