Question 1

Why do we use había destruido (had destroyed) instead of the simple past destruyó (destroyed) here?

Accepted Answer

We use the past perfect (the imperfect of haber plus a past participle) to show that an action happened before another action in the past. The empire's destruction of the civilization happened before the time the archaeologist knew about it.

Question 2

I notice destruido doesn't have an accent mark. Don't we usually put accents on past participles with vowels together, like leído?

Accepted Answer

You only need an accent mark when combining a strong vowel (A, E, or O) with a weak vowel (I or U) to separate them into two syllables, like in leído or creído. Because destruido combines two weak vowels (U and I), they naturally blend into one syllable, so no accent mark is needed.

Question 3

Why is 'knew' translated as the imperfect sabía rather than the preterite supo?

Accepted Answer

In the past tense, saber changes its meaning slightly depending on the form. The imperfect sabía describes an ongoing state in the past, meaning someone already knew or was aware of something. If we used the preterite supo, it would mean the archaeologist found out or discovered it at that specific moment.

Question 4

Why is it esa civilización instead of ese civilización?

Accepted Answer

Nouns ending in -ción are almost always feminine in Spanish. Because of this, you must use the feminine word for 'that' (esa) to match the gender.

El arqueólogo sabía que el imperio había destruido esa civilización.

Breakdown of El arqueólogo sabía que el imperio había destruido esa civilización.

Questions & Answers about El arqueólogo sabía que el imperio había destruido esa civilización.

Learn El arqueólogo sabía que el imperio había destruido esa civilización and more in Spanish