Что бы ни случилось, я смогу защитить обоих детей.

Questions & Answers about Что бы ни случилось, я смогу защитить обоих детей.

Why is the past tense verb случилось used when the rest of the sentence is in the future tense?
In Russian, the construction of an interrogative pronoun + бы ни + past tense expresses a universal or hypothetical concession, like "whatever happens" or "no matter what happens". The particle бы triggers the past tense form to create this hypothetical meaning, even when the actual context is about the future or present.
Why do we use the particle ни instead of не before the verb?
In this construction, ни does not negate the verb. Together with the question word (что) and бы, the particle ни translates to "-ever" or "no matter what". If you used не instead, it would be a standard negation, changing the meaning to "whatever would not happen".
Why is the word for "both" translated as обоих rather than оба?
The numeral оба (both) declines based on gender, case, and animacy. Here, it is in the accusative case because it is the direct object of защитить (to protect). Since детей (children) is an animate noun, the accusative form matches the genitive form, making it обоих (the form used for masculine or mixed-gender groups). If the noun were inanimate, it would remain оба.
Why are смогу and защитить in the perfective aspect here?
The speaker is focusing on the successful result of the action in a specific, hypothetical future scenario. Смогу (the perfective of мочь) means "I will manage to be able", and защитить (the perfective of защищать) focuses on the completed act of successfully keeping the children safe, rather than the ongoing process of protecting them.

Learn Что бы ни случилось, я смогу защитить обоих детей and more in Russian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free