Amo tutti gli animali, solo che questo cane abbaia sempre.

Questions & Answers about Amo tutti gli animali, solo che questo cane abbaia sempre.

Why do we use the indicative abbaia after solo che instead of the subjunctive?
Solo che (meaning "except that" or "the only thing is") introduces a factual afterthought, limitation, or obstacle. Because it states an objective reality (this dog does always bark), it triggers the indicative mood, unlike conditional conjunctions like a meno che (unless) which require the subjunctive.
Could I just use ma (but) instead of solo che in this sentence?
Grammatically, yes, but solo che has a much more specific conversational flavor. While ma simply contrasts two ideas, solo che acts like "the only catch is" or "except for the fact that". It sets up a highly specific, limiting exception to your broad statement about loving tutti gli animali.
Why is it tutti gli animali and not just tutti animali like in the English "all animals"?
In Italian, when tutto (or its plural forms like tutti) is used as an adjective to mean "all" or "the whole," it must be followed by the definite article. So "all animals" is always translated literally as "all the animals" (tutti gli animali).
Why does sempre come after the verb (abbaia sempre) when in English we say "always barks"?
In Italian, adverbs of frequency like sempre (always) or spesso (often) generally go immediately after the conjugated verb. Placing it before the verb would sound unnatural to a native speaker.

Learn Amo tutti gli animali, solo che questo cane abbaia sempre and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free