Sölumaðurinn sýnir ekki bara vasahnífinn, heldur líka tólið.

Questions & Answers about Sölumaðurinn sýnir ekki bara vasahnífinn, heldur líka tólið.

How does the ekki bara... heldur líka structure affect the cases of vasahnífinn and tólið?
This correlative conjunction links the two nouns, meaning they share the exact same grammatical role in the sentence. Since sýnir (shows) requires its direct object to be in the accusative case, both vasahnífinn and tólið must be in the accusative.
Is the word líka strictly required in this sentence?
It is highly recommended but occasionally dropped. Just like in English, you could technically say "not only the knife, but the tool" (ekki bara... heldur), but adding líka (also) makes the sentence feel much more balanced and natural.
If I wanted to add "shows me" to this sentence, what case would "me" take?
It would take the dative case. The verb sýna takes the dative for the person being shown something, and the accusative for the item being shown. You would say Sölumaðurinn sýnir mér... where mér is dative.
Both vasahnífinn and tólið are definite and in the accusative case. Why do their endings look so different?
This comes down to noun gender. Vasahnífur is a masculine noun, so its definite accusative suffix is -inn. Tól is a neuter noun, so its definite accusative suffix is -ið.

Learn Sölumaðurinn sýnir ekki bara vasahnífinn, heldur líka tólið and more in Icelandic

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free