Log inSign up

I kväll ska hon skriva klart sin ansökan och skicka den till arbetsgivaren.

I kväll ska hon skriva klart sin ansökan och skicka den till arbetsgivaren.
Tonight she will finish writing her application and send it to the employer.
FromLesson 28inHardcore Swedish
……

Questions & Answers about I kväll ska hon skriva klart sin ansökan och skicka den till arbetsgivaren.

Why does the sentence start with I kväll, and why is it ska hon instead of hon ska?

Swedish main clauses follow the V2 rule: the finite verb (here ska) must be in the second position.

  • If you start with a time phrase like I kväll in position 1, the verb still has to be position 2, so the subject moves after it: I kväll ska hon ...
  • If you start with the subject, you get: Hon ska skriva klart sin ansökan i kväll.
What exactly does ska mean here—future, intention, obligation?
Ska often expresses a planned/decided future and can also carry a sense of intention. Depending on context, it can also sound a bit like “is supposed to / has to”, but in this sentence it most naturally reads as a plan: she has decided that tonight she will do it.
Why is it ska hon skriva and not ska hon att skriva?

After modal verbs like ska, kan, vill, måste, Swedish uses the bare infinitive (no att):

  • Hon ska skriva.
    You typically use att with non-modal constructions, e.g. Hon försöker att skriva (often just försöker skriva).
Is I kväll the only correct spelling, or can it be ikväll?
Both occur, but I kväll (two words) is the more standard spelling in careful writing. Ikväll is common in more informal writing and reflects how it’s often pronounced in quick speech.
How does skriva klart work грамmatically—why is klart there?

Skriva klart means to finish writing (something). Klart is originally an adjective (klar/klart) but here it functions like an adverb meaning completely / finished.
You’ll see similar patterns: äta klart (finish eating), läsa klart (finish reading).

Could you place klart somewhere else, like after the object?

Sometimes, but the most natural options are:

  • skriva klart sin ansökan (very common)
    You may also hear/see:
  • skriva sin ansökan klar (possible but often sounds more formal/marked)
    With a pronoun object, skriva klart den is fine and common.
Why is it sin ansökan and not hennes ansökan?

Sin/sitt/sina is the reflexive possessive, used when the possessor is the subject of the same clause:

  • Hon (subject) … sin ansökan = her own application (belonging to her).
    Hennes is used when it refers to someone else’s (or when you want to avoid reflexive reference):
  • Hon skickade hennes ansökan would normally mean she sent another woman’s application.
Why is there no article—why not sin en ansökan?

In Swedish, when you use a possessive like sin, you don’t use the indefinite article (en/ett) before the noun:

  • en ansökan = an application
  • sin ansökan = her (own) application
    So sin en ansökan is not grammatical.
Is ansökan definite here (since ansökan can mean “the application”)?

Good catch: ansökan can look like the definite form, because:

  • en ansökan (indefinite)
  • ansökan (definite)
    But after a possessive (sin), the noun is treated as indefinite in grammar, even if the written form is identical. So sin ansökan functions like “her application,” not “her the application.”
Why is it skicka den—what does den refer to, and why not det?

Den refers back to ansökan. Since ansökan is an en-word (common gender), the pronoun is den.
You’d use det for an ett-word noun. Example: ett brev → skicka det.

Why is it till arbetsgivaren (definite), and when would you use till en arbetsgivare?

Arbetsgivaren is the definite form, implying a specific employer is understood (e.g., the company she’s applying to).
If it’s not a particular one, you could say till en arbetsgivare (“to an employer”), but that’s less typical in this context because applications usually have a specific recipient.

Why use till here—could it be åt?

For sending something to a recipient, till is the standard choice: skicka den till arbetsgivaren.
Åt is more like “for (someone’s benefit)” and is common with giving/doing something for someone, but it’s usually not the default with skicka in this meaning.

Why doesn’t the sentence repeat ska before skicka?

Swedish often coordinates infinitives after one modal verb. So ska governs both actions:

  • ska [skriva klart …] och [skicka …]
    You can repeat it for emphasis or clarity (… och ska skicka …), but it’s not necessary and sounds slightly heavier.

More from this lesson

ansöka omansökanheltJag är helt färdig nu.Hon vill ansöka om ett nytt jobb, men hennes ansökan är inte helt färdig.skriva klartJag ska skriva klart mejlet innan jag åker hem.arbetsgivaren
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Swedish grammar?”
Swedish grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Swedish

Master Swedish — from I kväll ska hon skriva klart sin ansökan och skicka den till arbetsgivaren to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Swedish freeBrowse the full course