Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал, что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение.

Breakdown of Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал, что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение.

мой
my
на
at
и
and
не
not
сказать
to say
что
that
это
it
посмотреть
to look
а
but
лёгкий
mild
лодыжка
the ankle
растяжение
the sprain
хирург
the surgeon
перелом
the fracture

Questions & Answers about Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал, что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение.

Why is it посмотрел, not смотрел?

Посмотрел is the perfective past tense of посмотреть. It presents the action as a single, completed event: the surgeon took a look at the ankle.

If you used смотрел, that would be imperfective, which often suggests an ongoing process, repeated action, or background description. In this sentence, Russian prefers посмотрел because the doctor examined it once and then gave a conclusion.

So:

  • посмотрел = looked / took a look
  • смотрел = was looking / looked for some time
Why is it на мою лодыжку?

The verb посмотреть на means to look at, and after на in this meaning, Russian uses the accusative case.

So:

  • лодыжка = nominative
  • лодыжку = accusative singular

And мою matches лодыжку in:

  • gender: feminine
  • number: singular
  • case: accusative

That is why you get:

  • на мою лодыжку = at my ankle
Why does мою end in ?

Because мой has to agree with лодыжку, which is:

The feminine singular accusative form of мой is мою.

A quick comparison:

  • моя лодыжка = my ankle (subject form, nominative)
  • вижу мою лодыжку = I see my ankle (object form, accusative)

So in this sentence, мою is there because the ankle is the object of посмотрел на.

Why is there a comma before что?

Because что introduces a subordinate clause, equivalent to English that in reported speech.

Main clause:

  • Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал

Subordinate clause:

  • что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение

Russian normally separates this kind of clause with a comma, so:

  • сказал, что... = said that...
Why does Russian use что here?

Here что means that and introduces what the surgeon said.

So:

  • сказал, что... = said that...

This is the standard way to report speech indirectly in Russian.
If you wanted direct speech, it would look different, for example:

  • Хирург сказал: Это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение.

But your sentence uses reported speech, so что is the natural choice.

Why is it это не перелом, with это?

In this kind of diagnosis or identification sentence, это often means it / this.

So:

  • это не перелом = it’s not a fracture
  • это лёгкое растяжение = it’s a mild sprain

Russian often uses это in statements where English uses it is.

Why is there no word for is in это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение?

Because in the present tense, Russian normally omits the verb быть (to be).

So English:

  • It is not a fracture

Russian:

  • Это не перелом

The idea of is is understood automatically.

If you put it in the past or future, then Russian does use a form of быть:

  • Это был не перелом, а растяжение. = It was not a fracture but a sprain.
  • Это будет растяжение. = It will be a sprain.
Why is it не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение, not не перелом, но лёгкое растяжение?

Because не ..., а ... is the standard pattern for not X, but Y when the second part corrects or replaces the first.

So:

  • не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение = not a fracture, but a mild sprain

By contrast, но usually means but in the sense of contrast, not correction.

Compare:

  • Это не перелом, а растяжение. = It’s not a fracture, but a sprain.
    (correction)
  • Это перелом, но лёгкий. = It’s a fracture, but a mild one.
    (contrast)
Why are перелом and растяжение in the same basic form?

They are both in the nominative singular here.

In sentences like Это перелом or Это растяжение, the noun after это is commonly in the nominative. Russian is basically identifying something: this/it is X.

So:

  • перелом = nominative singular
  • растяжение = nominative singular

This is why you do not see forms like переломом or растяжением here.

Why is it лёгкое растяжение?

Because лёгкое is an adjective and it must agree with растяжение.

Растяжение is:

So the adjective also becomes:

  • лёгкое

Compare:

  • лёгкий перелом = a mild fracture (masculine)
  • лёгкая травма = a mild injury (feminine)
  • лёгкое растяжение = a mild sprain (neuter)
What does растяжение mean exactly here?

In this context, растяжение means a sprain or sometimes more generally a strain, depending on context. With an ankle, English usually says sprain.

Russian medical usage often prefers nouns like:

  • перелом = fracture
  • вывих = dislocation
  • растяжение = sprain/strain

So in this sentence, лёгкое растяжение is naturally understood as a mild sprain.

Why is the verb сказал masculine?

Because it agrees with хирург, which is grammatically masculine here.

In the past tense, Russian verbs show gender:

  • сказал = masculine
  • сказала = feminine
  • сказало = neuter
  • сказали = plural

Since the sentence says Хирург ... сказал, the surgeon is being treated as masculine.

If the speaker wanted to make it clearly female, you would often see:

  • Хирург посмотрела на мою лодыжку и сказала...
Is хирург just surgeon, or can it mean doctor more generally?

Хирург specifically means surgeon, not just any doctor.

More general words would be:

  • врач = doctor
  • доктор = doctor
  • хирург = surgeon

So this sentence is specifically saying that a surgeon looked at the ankle.

Is лодыжка the normal word for ankle?

Yes, лодыжка is a standard word for ankle, especially in everyday speech and medical contexts.

You may also come across щиколотка, which can also mean ankle in many contexts. The two words overlap a lot, though лодыжка is very natural here.

So:

  • лодыжка = ankle
  • моя лодыжка = my ankle
Does the word order matter here?

The sentence has a very natural, neutral word order:

  • Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал, что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение.

Russian word order is more flexible than English, but this version sounds straightforward and standard. It goes:

  1. who did it
  2. what they did
  3. what they said

You could rearrange parts for emphasis, but this version is the most natural for a plain statement.

Why is there also a comma before а?

Because а is a coordinating conjunction, and in this sentence it links two contrasted parts:

  • не перелом
  • лёгкое растяжение

Russian punctuation normally puts a comma before а in this kind of contrast:

  • не X, а Y

So the punctuation in the second clause is completely standard:

  • это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
What's the best way to learn Russian grammar?
Russian grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Russian

Master Russian — from Хирург посмотрел на мою лодыжку и сказал, что это не перелом, а лёгкое растяжение to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • AI tutor to answer your grammar questions