Log inSign up

Начальница сказала, что не стоит спешить, и мы спокойно обсудили план.

Начальница сказала, что не стоит спешить, и мы спокойно обсудили план.
The (female) boss said that it’s not worth hurrying, and we calmly discussed the plan.

Breakdown of Начальница сказала, что не стоит спешить, и мы спокойно обсудили план.

и
and
не
not
мы
we
сказать
to say
что
that
спокойно
calmly
план
the plan
обсудить
to discuss
спешить
to hurry
стоить
to be worth
начальница
boss
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about Начальница сказала, что не стоит спешить, и мы спокойно обсудили план.

Why is Начальница in the feminine form, and what exactly does it mean?

Начальница is the feminine noun for boss / supervisor / manager (a female boss). The masculine counterpart is начальник.
The sentence uses начальница because the speaker is referring to a woman in a leadership role.

Why is сказала feminine, and what verb form is it?

Сказала is past tense, feminine singular of сказать (perfective). In Russian past tense, the verb agrees with the subject in gender and number:

  • он сказал (he said)
  • она сказала (she said)
  • они сказали (they said)
Why do we need что, and what does it do?

Что here is the conjunction that, introducing a subordinate clause after a verb of saying/thinking: сказала, что ... = said that ....
Russian typically uses что in this structure, much like English uses that (though English often omits it).

What does the expression не стоит + infinitive mean grammatically?

Не стоит is a common impersonal-style expression meaning it’s not worth / it’s not advisable / you shouldn’t + infinitive.
Literally, стоить means to cost / to be worth, but in this pattern it becomes a recommendation:

  • Не стоит спешить = You shouldn’t rush / It’s not worth rushing.
    It’s not commanding like an imperative; it’s softer advice.
Why is it спешить (imperfective) and not a perfective verb?

Спешить is imperfective because the idea is about the general action of “rushing” as a process/behavior, not one completed “rush” event.
With не стоит, Russian commonly uses the imperfective infinitive to talk about avoiding an ongoing manner of action: don’t rush (in general / at this moment).

How is не стоит спешить different from не спеши(те)?
  • Не стоит спешить = softer, more impersonal advice: it’s not necessary / it’s better not to rush.
  • Не спеши (informal) / Не спешите (formal/plural) = direct imperative: don’t rush (a command/request to the listener).
    The sentence uses the softer “advice” tone.
Why are there commas: сказала, что ... , и ...?

Two main reasons: 1) сказала, что ...: the comma separates the main clause from the subordinate что-clause.
2) ..., и мы ...: the comma before и is used because it joins two independent clauses:

  • Начальница сказала ...
  • мы обсудили план
What does спокойно modify, and where can it go in the sentence?

Спокойно is an adverb meaning calmly. Here it modifies обсудили (how you discussed).
Word order is flexible, for example:

  • и мы спокойно обсудили план (neutral)
  • и мы обсудили план спокойно (also fine; slightly different emphasis)
  • и спокойно мы обсудили план (more stylistic/emphatic)
Why is it обсудили (perfective) and not обсуждали?

Обсудили (perfective) implies the discussion was brought to a result / completed as a whole: you discussed it through.
Обсуждали (imperfective) would emphasize the process without saying it reached completion (you were discussing it / discussed it at some point).
So обсудили план tends to mean we discussed the plan (and got through it).

Why is план in this form, and what case is it?

План is in the accusative singular (direct object of обсудили). For masculine inanimate nouns, accusative = nominative, so it looks unchanged:

  • план (Nom)
  • план (Acc, inanimate)
Why does Russian use мы here—could it be omitted?

Yes, мы can sometimes be omitted because the verb ending shows the subject (обсудили = “we discussed”).
But including мы is common for clarity and emphasis, especially after и:

  • ..., и обсудили план (possible, a bit more “connected”/compressed)
  • ..., и мы обсудили план (clearer; stresses “we” as the ones who did it)
Does и here mean simply “and,” or does it imply sequence (“and then”)?

И mainly means and, but in many narratives it naturally implies sequence when the context is chronological: first she said something, and (then) we discussed the plan.
If you wanted to force “then,” Russian might add потом or затем, but it’s not necessary here.