Log inSign up

I kveld passer jeg på nabokatten, så den ikke blir ensom.

I kveld passer jeg på nabokatten, så den ikke blir ensom.
Tonight I look after the neighbor’s cat so it doesn’t get lonely.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Norwegian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Norwegian now

Questions & Answers about I kveld passer jeg på nabokatten, så den ikke blir ensom.

Why is the word order I kveld passer jeg and not I kveld jeg passer?

Because Norwegian has V2 word order in main clauses: the finite verb (here passer) must be in the second position. When you start with something other than the subject (here the time adverbial I kveld), the verb still stays second, so the subject moves after it:

  • I kveld (1st position) + passer (2nd position) + jeg (then the rest)
What exactly does passer på mean here, and why does it need på?

Passe på is a very common verb phrase meaning to look after / keep an eye on / take care of (a person, animal, thing). The på is part of the fixed expression; without it, passe usually means to fit / suit / match.

  • Jeg passer på katten. = I’m looking after the cat.
  • Denne genseren passer. = This sweater fits.
Why is it nabokatten and not something like nabo katt or nabokatt?

Norwegian often forms compound nouns (like English neighbor + cat → neighbor cat). Here:

  • nabo (neighbor) + katten (the cat) → nabokatten (the neighbor’s cat / the neighbor cat)

It’s also definite (-en) because you’re referring to a specific, known cat (the one belonging to the neighbor).

Could you also say naboens katt instead of nabokatten? What’s the difference?

Yes. Both are natural, but they highlight slightly different things:

  • nabokatten = the neighbor-cat (compound; very common, compact)
  • naboens katt = the neighbor’s cat (explicit possession with -ens)

In everyday speech, nabokatten is often the most idiomatic.

Why is there a comma before så?

Because så here introduces a result/purpose clause (roughly so (that)), and it’s very common to separate the two parts with a comma:

  • I kveld passer jeg på nabokatten, så den ikke blir ensom.

In writing, that comma helps readability and is widely used in Norwegian.

Does så mean so or so that here?

Functionally it’s so that: you’re giving the reason/purpose/result of watching the cat—in order that it doesn’t become lonely. Norwegian often uses så where English might prefer so that.

Why is it så den ikke blir and not så blir den ikke?

Because after så (in this meaning), the following clause behaves like a subordinate clause, and subordinate clauses normally have no V2 inversion. So the word order is:

  • subject + (ikke) + verb → den ikke blir

If it were a main clause with V2, you could get patterns like så blir den ikke ..., but that would sound like a different structure and emphasis.

Why does ikke come before blir?

In Norwegian subordinate clauses, ikke typically comes before the finite verb:

  • ... så den ikke blir ensom.

In main clauses, ikke usually comes after the finite verb:

  • Den blir ikke ensom. (main clause)
Why is the pronoun den used for the cat? Could it be han or hun?

Den is the normal pronoun for an animal when you’re speaking generally or not emphasizing personality/sex (similar to English it). For pets, Norwegians also often use han/hun if the animal is seen as more like a family member or if the sex is known:

  • Neutral: så den ikke blir ensom
  • More personal: så hun ikke blir ensom / så han ikke blir ensom
Why does it say blir ensom (becomes lonely) instead of er ensom (is lonely)?

Because the idea is prevention: you’re watching the cat so it won’t end up becoming lonely during the evening. Bli focuses on a change of state:

  • Den er ensom. = It is lonely (already)
  • Den blir ensom. = It becomes / will get lonely (as time passes)