Breakdown of Quamquam taurus cornua magna habet, filia agricolae ad eum sine timore ambulat, quia taurus mansuetus est.
Questions & Answers about Quamquam taurus cornua magna habet, filia agricolae ad eum sine timore ambulat, quia taurus mansuetus est.
What does quamquam do in this sentence?
Quamquam introduces a concessive clause: a clause that means although or even though.
So quamquam taurus cornua magna habet means although the bull has large horns.
It sets up a contrast:
- the bull has big horns,
- but the farmer’s daughter still walks toward him without fear.
Why is the verb after quamquam written as habet and not in the subjunctive?
Because quamquam commonly takes the indicative in straightforward Latin prose.
So:
- taurus ... habet = the bull has
- not a subjunctive form
This is a useful pattern to remember:
- quamquam
- indicative = although ...
What case is cornua, and why does it end in -a?
Cornua is the accusative plural of cornu, meaning horn.
Here it is the direct object of habet:
- taurus cornua magna habet = the bull has large horns
The noun cornu is neuter, so its plural nominative and accusative form is cornua.
This can look surprising to English speakers, because the ending -a is often associated with first-declension feminine nouns, but here it is simply the normal neuter plural form of cornu.
Why is it magna and not magnas?
Because magna agrees with cornua, which is neuter plural accusative.
In Latin, adjectives must match the nouns they describe in:
- gender
- number
- case
Since cornua is:
- neuter
- plural
- accusative
the adjective must also be:
- neuter
- plural
- accusative
That gives magna.
So:
- cornua magna = large horns
Why is habet singular if cornua is plural?
Because cornua is not the subject. It is the object.
The subject is taurus, which is singular:
- taurus = the bull
So the verb is singular too:
- taurus ... habet = the bull has
A good way to see it is:
- Who is doing the having? → taurus
- What is being had? → cornua magna
What case is agricolae in filia agricolae?
Agricolae is genitive singular.
So filia agricolae means:
- the daughter of the farmer
This is a very common Latin pattern:
- noun + genitive noun
- X of Y
So:
- filia = daughter
- agricolae = of the farmer
Is agricola really masculine even though it looks like a first-declension noun?
Yes. Agricola is a very common example of a first-declension masculine noun.
That can seem odd at first, because many first-declension nouns are feminine. But some nouns referring to male persons are masculine, even in the first declension.
So:
- agricola = farmer
- gender: masculine
- genitive singular: agricolae
That is why filia agricolae means the farmer’s daughter.
Why does the sentence say ad eum?
Because ad means to or toward, and it takes the accusative case.
Here:
- ad = toward
- eum = him in the accusative singular masculine
So ad eum ambulat means:
- she walks toward him
The pronoun eum refers back to taurus.
Why is it eum and not ei?
Because ad requires the accusative, not the dative.
The forms are different:
- ei = to him / for him (dative)
- eum = him (accusative)
Since Latin says ad + accusative for motion toward a person or thing, it must be:
- ad eum
not
- ad ei
Why is sine timore in the ablative?
Because the preposition sine always takes the ablative.
So:
- sine = without
- timore = ablative singular of timor
Together:
- sine timore = without fear
This is a good vocabulary-and-case combination to memorize:
- sine + ablative
Why is the last part quia taurus mansuetus est?
Because quia introduces a clause giving a reason:
- because the bull is tame
The structure is:
- quia = because
- taurus = subject
- mansuetus = predicate adjective
- est = is
So the clause explains why the girl walks toward him without fear.
What form is mansuetus?
Mansuetus is an adjective in the nominative singular masculine.
It agrees with taurus, which is also:
- nominative
- singular
- masculine
So:
- taurus mansuetus est = the bull is tame
This is a standard Latin pattern:
- subject + adjective + est
Why is taurus repeated in the last clause instead of using a pronoun?
Latin often repeats a noun where English might use he or it.
So instead of saying something like quia is mansuetus est, the sentence says:
- quia taurus mansuetus est
This repetition can make the sentence:
- clearer
- more explicit
- easier to follow
Especially for learners, it helps show exactly what mansuetus describes.
Is the word order special here?
Latin word order is flexible, because the endings show how words function.
This sentence uses a very natural prose order, but it does not have to match English word order exactly.
For example:
- Quamquam taurus cornua magna habet
- filia agricolae ad eum sine timore ambulat
- quia taurus mansuetus est
A few things to notice:
- the verb often comes later than in English
- important words can be placed earlier or later for emphasis
- the endings, not the position alone, tell you the grammar
So Latin word order matters, but not in the same rigid way as English.
Why is there no word for the or a in the sentence?
Because Latin has no articles.
That means Latin does not have separate words for:
- the
- a
- an
So a noun like taurus can mean:
- the bull
- a bull
and the exact sense depends on context.
The same is true for:
- filia = the daughter or a daughter
- agricola = the farmer or a farmer
English has to choose an article, but Latin does not.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Quamquam taurus cornua magna habet, filia agricolae ad eum sine timore ambulat, quia taurus mansuetus est to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions