Log inSign up

Puer dicit se sororem laedere non velle, sed tantum ludere.

Puer dicit se sororem laedere non velle, sed tantum ludere.
The boy says that he does not want to harm his sister, but only to play.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin

Breakdown of Puer dicit se sororem laedere non velle, sed tantum ludere.

puer
the boy
soror
the sister
non
not
sed
but
ludere
to play
dicere
to say
velle
to want
se
himself
laedere
to harm
tantum
only
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Puer dicit se sororem laedere non velle, sed tantum ludere to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Puer dicit se sororem laedere non velle, sed tantum ludere.

Why does Latin use se here instead of eum or illum?

Because this is reported speech after dicit (he says). In indirect speech, Latin often uses a reflexive pronoun (se) to refer back to the subject of the reporting verb (puer). So se means himself / that he (i.e., the boy), not some other male person.

What grammar construction is dicit se ... velle?

It’s an indirect statement:

  • dicit = “he says” (verb of saying)
  • se (accusative subject) + velle (infinitive verb) = the reported content

So dicit se ... velle literally works like: he says [him] to want ..., which we translate naturally as he says that he wants ... / doesn’t want ....

Why is se in the accusative case?

In an indirect statement, the “subject” of the reported clause is put in the accusative (the accusative-and-infinitive construction). That’s why it’s se, not (for example) a nominative form.

Why is sororem accusative?

Because sororem is the direct object of laedere (to hurt). The verb laedere takes an accusative object: laedere sororem = to hurt (his/the) sister.

Does sororem definitely mean “his sister”?

Not strictly. sororem by itself means (a/the) sister. But because the subject of the wanting/hurting is se (the boy himself), it’s usually understood in context as his sister, even though Latin hasn’t explicitly said suam sororem.

Why do we have two infinitives: laedere and velle?

Because velle (to want) commonly takes a complementary infinitive explaining what is wanted:

  • velle laedere = to want to hurt
    Here, laedere is the action that is (not) wanted, and velle is the verb expressing desire.
What does non velle mean, and why is non placed before velle?

non velle means to not want. Placing non right before velle makes the negation apply to the wanting:

  • se sororem laedere non velle = he doesn’t want to hurt his sister
    This is different from negating laedere (which would suggest “he wants to not-hurt her,” a subtler idea).
Could Latin have used nolle instead of non velle?

Yes. nolle = non velle (“to be unwilling / to not want”). So Latin could also say se sororem laedere nolle. Using non velle is perfectly normal; sometimes writers choose it for clarity or emphasis.

How does sed tantum ludere connect to the earlier part of the sentence?

It’s an contrast introduced by sed (but), and it’s slightly elliptical (something is understood):

  • full sense: (se) non velle laedere, sed (se velle) tantum ludere
    So velle (and se) are understood again: but (he wants) only to play.
What exactly does tantum modify?

tantum means only here, modifying ludere: tantum ludere = only to play (i.e., play and nothing more serious like hurting).

Is the word order unusual? Why is it se sororem laedere non velle instead of something more “English-like”?

Latin word order is flexible and often arranged for emphasis and clarity. Here the core pieces are grouped so you can process the idea smoothly:

  • se (who we’re talking about in the indirect statement)
  • sororem laedere (the action/content: hurting his sister)
  • non velle (the main point: he doesn’t want to)

So the order is very natural Latin, even if it isn’t the same order English would use.

What tense is dicit, and does it affect the infinitives?
dicit is present tense: he says. The infinitives velle, laedere, ludere are present infinitives, which typically represent actions contemporaneous with the main verb (in the simplest reading): he says (now) that he doesn’t want (now) to hurt her, but only to play.