Breakdown of Veðrið er kalt, en við göngum samt í skóginn.
Questions & Answers about Veðrið er kalt, en við göngum samt í skóginn.
Why is it Veðrið and not just veður?
What’s going on with the word veðrið—why does ð appear and how is it pronounced?
Why is the sentence Veðrið er kalt and not Veðrið er kaldur/köld?
Because veður/veðrið is neuter singular, the adjective must agree:
- masculine: kaldur
- feminine: köld
- neuter: kalt ✅
So kalt matches veðrið in gender (neuter), number (singular), and case (nominative here).
Is kalt an adjective or an adverb here?
Why is there a comma before en?
In Icelandic, you normally use a comma before coordinating conjunctions like en when they connect two independent clauses:
What exactly does en mean, and how is it different from og?
en is but (contrast). og is and (addition).
So en signals that the second clause goes against the expectation created by the first: it’s cold, but we go anyway.
Why is it við göngum instead of við gengum?
This is a common verb pattern: the verb að ganga (to walk) changes its stem vowel in the present tense.
Present tense (typical forms):
Does ganga here mean “walk” literally, or can it mean “go”?
What does samt mean, and where can it go in the sentence?
samt means anyway / nevertheless. Its placement is flexible, but it commonly appears after the verb (or after the subject + verb chunk) like here: við göngum samt.
You can also see:
- Samt göngum við í skóginn. (more emphasis on “anyway”)
- Við göngum í skóginn samt. (possible, but often feels more “tag-like”)
Why is it í skóginn and not í skógi?
Because í changes meaning depending on the case:
- í + accusative = motion into (direction) ✅ í skóginn
- í + dative = location in (being there) → í skógi / í skóginum
So this sentence is “we walk into the forest,” not “we walk in the forest.”
What case is skóginn, and how is it formed?
skóginn is accusative singular definite of skógur (forest).
- indefinite: skógur (nom.), skóg (acc.)
- definite: skógurinn (nom.), skóginn (acc.) ✅
It’s accusative because í takes accusative when expressing motion/direction.
Could I also say í skóginn without -inn (i.e., í skóg)?
Is the word order fixed, or can it be changed?
The basic order here is very natural:
[subject] Veðrið + [verb] er + [predicate] kalt, en [subject] við + [verb] göngum + [adverb] samt + [prep phrase] í skóginn.
You can move elements for emphasis, but Icelandic still follows a “verb-second” tendency in main clauses. For example, starting with Samt typically brings the verb early: Samt göngum við í skóginn.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Veðrið er kalt, en við göngum samt í skóginn to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions