Ik zal je straks zeggen waar we moeten wachten.

I will tell you soon where we have to wait.

Breakdown of Ik zal je straks zeggen waar we moeten wachten.

• ik: I
• wij: we
• straks: soon
• moeten: must
• zullen: will
• je: you
• wachten: to wait
• waar: where
• zeggen: to tell

Questions & Answers about Ik zal je straks zeggen waar we moeten wachten.

What does zal express in this sentence?

Zal is the present-tense form of the auxiliary verb zullen, which in Dutch is used to form the future tense. Here it functions like English will, indicating that the act of telling is going to happen shortly. Note that for very near futures, Dutch speakers often drop zal and use the present tense (see the last question).

Why is je placed right after zal, before straks?

In Dutch main clauses the finite verb (here zal) must occupy the second position, and pronouns typically follow immediately after. Adverbs like straks come after short pronouns. So the order is: Subject (Ik) – Finite Verb (zal) – Pronoun (je) – Adverb (straks) – Rest of the clause.

What exactly does straks mean, and how is it different from zo or later?

Straks means “in a little while” or “shortly.”
• Zo often implies “right away” or “any second now.”
• Later is more vague, referring to some point further in time.
So straks sits between zo (very soon) and later (at an unspecified later time).

Can you use vertellen instead of zeggen here? What’s the difference?

Yes, you can say Ik zal je straks vertellen waar we moeten wachten.
– vertellen = “to tell someone something,” taking a direct object (the listener).
– zeggen = “to say something (to someone),” usually used with tegen: zeggen tegen iemand.
In practice, vertellen is more idiomatic when specifying to whom you tell something, while zeggen focuses on the words themselves.

Why is the clause waar we moeten wachten placed at the end?

Waar we moeten wachten is an embedded (indirect) question acting as the object of zeggen/vertellen. In Dutch, embedded questions come after the main clause, so the entire waar-clause is postponed to the end.

Why is the word order in waar we moeten wachten Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) and not verb-final like in other subordinate clauses?

Because it’s an indirect question introduced by a question word (waar). In embedded questions and relative clauses with question words, Dutch uses the same word order as a direct question minus inversion:
Direct: Waar moeten we wachten?
Indirect: waar + subject (we) + finite verb (moeten) + other verbs/objects.

What role does moeten play in waar we moeten wachten?

Moeten is a modal verb meaning “must” or “have to.” Combined with the infinitive wachten, it expresses necessity or obligation. So moeten wachten = “have to wait.”

Do you have to use zal, or can you use the present tense?

For events in the near future, Dutch often uses the present tense. You could say Ik zeg je straks waar we moeten wachten, which sounds perfectly natural. Using zal simply emphasizes that it’s a planned promise.