Breakdown of Ik heb gisteravond laat moeten werken aan het nieuwe apparaat.
ik
I
hebben
to have
nieuw
new
moeten
must
werken
to work
laat
late
aan
on
het apparaat
the device
gisteravond
last night
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Dutch grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Ik heb gisteravond laat moeten werken aan het nieuwe apparaat.
Why do we use heb … moeten instead of just moest to talk about having to work last night?
Dutch can express past events either with the simple past (imperfectum) or the present perfect (voltooide tijd).
- Ik moest gisteravond laat werken uses the imperfectum (“I had to work last night”).
- Ik heb gisteravond laat moeten werken uses the perfectum (“I have had to work late last night”), which is more common in spoken Dutch.
With modal verbs like moeten, the past participle does not get a ge- prefix—the infinitive moeten itself functions as the participle—so the structure is heb- moeten
- werken.
- moeten
Why do moeten and werken both appear at the end of the sentence?
In a Dutch main clause, the finite verb (heb) sits in second position, and all non-finite verbs (here the modal moeten plus the main verb werken) are pushed to the very end. When you have a modal in the perfect, you keep the modal’s infinitive (moeten) and the main verb’s infinitive (werken) together as the final verb cluster.
Why is it gisteravond and not gisteren avond?
Gisteravond is a single compound word meaning “last evening” or “last night.” Dutch frequently combines time expressions into one word. You write gisteravond solidly, without a space.
Why is laat placed after gisteravond? Could we say laat gisteravond?
The normal order for time-manner-place adverbials is to put the specific time expression (gisteravond) first, then the manner or qualifier (laat). So gisteravond laat = “late last night.” In casual speech you might hear laat gisteravond, but the unmarked, standard order is gisteravond laat.
Why do we use aan in werken aan het nieuwe apparaat?
In Dutch, the verb werken requires the preposition aan when you specify the object you’re working on. So werken aan = “to work on.” Omitting aan would be incorrect here.
Why is it het nieuwe apparaat and not de nieuwe apparaat?
Apparaat is a neuter noun, so its definite article is het. When you add an adjective before a definite neuter noun, you give the adjective an -e ending: het nieuwe apparaat.
Could we say Ik moest gisteravond laat aan het nieuwe apparaat werken instead?
Yes.
- Ik moest … werken uses the simple past (imperfectum).
- Ik heb … moeten werken uses the perfectum.
Both are correct and carry the same core meaning. The perfectum version is very common in conversation.
Can we move gisteravond laat to the front of the sentence?
Yes. In Dutch, if a time expression starts the sentence, you invert subject and finite verb:
Gisteravond laat heb ik moeten werken aan het nieuwe apparaat.
This fronting puts emphasis on when you had to work.