Learn Hardcore Dutch: Halverwege de wandeling leent Anna mij haar verrekijker, omdat mijn zicht niet scherp genoeg is. - Halfway through the walk Anna lends me her binoculars, because my vision is not sharp enough.

halverwege literally means ‘halfway’ and functions as an adverbial phrase. In halverwege de wandeling it tells you when something happens: ‘halfway through the walk’. You can attach it to other events, for example halverwege de film (‘halfway through the movie’).

Why does the verb leent come before the subject Anna?

Dutch follows the V2 (verb-second) rule. When a sentence starts with an adverbial phrase (halverwege de wandeling), the finite verb (leent) must occupy the second position, and the subject (Anna) follows it:
[Adverbial] + [Verb] + [Subject] + …

What’s the difference between mij and me in leent Anna mij haar verrekijker?

Both mij and me mean ‘me’.

mij is the stressed or more formal object pronoun.
me is the unstressed/informal form you’d commonly hear in speech.
In writing or for emphasis you’ll often see mij, but Anna leent me haar verrekijker is perfectly natural in conversation.

Why is it haar verrekijker and not something else?

haar is the third-person singular feminine possessive pronoun referring to Anna (a female). Dutch possessives agree with the possessor’s gender/number:

Anna (she) → haar verrekijker (‘her binoculars’)
If it were Peter, you’d say zijn verrekijker (‘his binoculars’).

Why is the verb is at the end of omdat mijn zicht niet scherp genoeg is?

Because omdat introduces a subordinate clause. In Dutch subordinate clauses the finite verb moves to the end. The pattern is:
[subordinator] + [subject] + [object/complements] + [verb]

What’s the nuance between omdat and want?

Both mean ‘because’, but:

omdat introduces a subordinate clause (verb goes to the end).
want is a coordinating conjunction, keeps normal main-clause word order (verb-second).
Example with want:
Anna leent mij haar verrekijker, want mijn zicht is niet scherp genoeg.

Why is it scherp genoeg and not genoeg scherp?

Adverb (genoeg) usually follows the adjective it modifies. So you say scherp genoeg (‘sharp enough’). Placing genoeg before the adjective is rare and can sound odd.

Why use the noun zicht instead of the verb zien?

zicht is the noun ‘sight’ or ‘vision’, which describes the quality of seeing. zien is the verb ‘to see’. To talk about the clarity of your vision you need the noun:
…omdat mijn zicht niet scherp genoeg is (‘because my sight isn’t sharp enough’).

What does verrekijker literally mean?

It combines verre (‘far’) + kijker (‘viewer’). It refers to one device that lets you see distant objects, i.e. ‘binoculars’. Dutch treats it as a singular noun, unlike English where ‘binoculars’ is plural.

Can the sentence be rearranged differently?

Yes. Dutch word order is flexible as long as you respect V2 and subordinate-clause rules. For example:

Anna leent mij halverwege de wandeling haar verrekijker, omdat mijn zicht niet scherp genoeg is.
Or split into two sentences:
Halverwege de wandeling leent Anna haar verrekijker aan mij. Mijn zicht was niet scherp genoeg.