Breakdown of Hvis vinden bliver stærkere langs kysten, vil vi ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger.
Questions & Answers about Hvis vinden bliver stærkere langs kysten, vil vi ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger.
Why does the sentence start with hvis, and how is that different from når?
Hvis means if and introduces a condition.
- Hvis vinden bliver stærkere ... = If the wind gets stronger ...
A common comparison is når, which often means when.
- hvis = a condition, something that may or may not happen
- når = something expected or seen as more certain/repeated
So here hvis fits because the sentence is about a possible situation, not a guaranteed one.
Why is it vinden and not just vind?
Vind is the basic noun: wind.
Danish often uses the definite form where English might simply say the + noun:
- vind = wind
- vinden = the wind
So vinden literally means the wind.
The ending -en shows that vind is a common-gender noun in the definite singular.
Why does it say bliver stærkere instead of just er stærkere?
Because bliver stærkere means gets stronger / becomes stronger, not just is stronger.
- er stærkere = is stronger
- bliver stærkere = becomes / gets stronger
The sentence is about a change in condition, so bliver is the natural choice.
How does stærkere work?
Stærkere is the comparative form of stærk (strong).
- stærk = strong
- stærkere = stronger
- stærkest = strongest
So:
- vinden bliver stærkere = the wind gets stronger
This is similar to English strong → stronger.
What does langs kysten mean exactly?
Langs means along and kysten means the coast.
So:
- langs kysten = along the coast
Kyst is the noun coast.
- kyst
- kysten = the coast
This phrase tells you where the wind is getting stronger.
Why is there a comma after kysten?
The first part of the sentence is a subordinate clause introduced by hvis:
- Hvis vinden bliver stærkere langs kysten
Then the main clause follows:
- vil vi ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger
In standard Danish writing, a comma is commonly used to separate these parts. So the comma helps show that the if-clause has ended and the main statement begins.
Why is the word order vil vi ikke instead of vi vil ikke?
This is a very important Danish word-order rule.
When a sentence begins with something other than the subject—here, the whole hvis clause comes first—the finite verb of the main clause comes before the subject.
So Danish has:
- Hvis ..., vil vi ...
not:
- Hvis ..., vi vil ...
This is part of the V2 rule in Danish: in main clauses, the finite verb usually comes in the second position.
Compare:
- Vi vil ikke sejle ud ... = We will not sail out ...
- Hvis ..., vil vi ikke sejle ud ... = If ..., we will not sail out ...
Why is ikke placed after vi?
In the main clause, the normal order here is:
- vil = finite verb
- vi = subject
- ikke = negation
- sejle = infinitive
So:
- vil vi ikke sejle = will we not sail
This placement is normal in Danish main clauses after inversion.
Compare:
- Vi vil ikke sejle = We will not sail
- Hvis ..., vil vi ikke sejle = If ..., we will not sail
Why does Danish use vil here? Is that the future tense?
Yes, vil is often used to express the future, similar to will in English.
- vil vi ikke sejle = we will not sail
But Danish does not have a special future verb ending the way some languages do. Instead, it often uses:
- vil
- infinitive
However, Danish can also use the present tense for future meaning in many situations. Here vil clearly expresses a future result of the condition.
What does sejle ud mean? Why are there two parts?
Sejle means to sail.
Ud means out.
Together, sejle ud means to sail out / head out by boat.
This is a common kind of Danish verb + particle combination, similar to English phrasal verbs:
- gå ud = go out
- køre ud = drive out
- sejle ud = sail out
So the ud adds the idea of movement outward, probably from shore or harbor into open water.
Why is it mellem de store bølger?
Mellem means between / among.
- mellem bølgerne would mean between the waves
- mellem de store bølger means among the big waves / between the big waves
Here the phrase describes the dangerous situation they want to avoid: sailing out where the waves are large.
Why is it de store bølger and not something else?
This is the definite plural with an adjective.
The noun is:
- en bølge = a wave
- bølger = waves
When Danish uses a definite plural noun with an adjective, it often uses:
- de
- adjective + plural noun
So:
- store bølger = big waves
- de store bølger = the big waves
The adjective stor becomes store in plural/definite contexts.
This is a very common pattern:
- den store båd = the big boat
- de store både = the big boats
Could Danish also say bølgerne here?
Yes, but it would sound a little different.
- mellem de store bølger = among the big waves
- mellem bølgerne = among the waves / between the waves
The version in your sentence emphasizes that they are specifically the big waves. Using de store bølger highlights the size and danger more clearly.
How would this sentence look in a more basic word order without the hvis clause first?
The main clause by itself would be:
- Vi vil ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger. = We will not sail out among the big waves.
Then you can add the condition in front:
- Hvis vinden bliver stærkere langs kysten, vil vi ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger.
Seeing the simple main clause first can make the inversion easier to understand.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Hvis vinden bliver stærkere langs kysten, vil vi ikke sejle ud mellem de store bølger to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions